On Wed, 25 Apr 2012 09:33:31 +0900, Charles Plessy wrote: > Talking about improvements, if the following part about NMU acknowledgement is > obsolete as I think, how about removing it, either as a separate bug, or as > part of the general refresh of the section that is discussed here. > > To acknowledge an NMU, include its changes and changelog entry in your next > maintainer upload. If you do not acknowledge the NMU by including the NMU > changelog entry in your changelog, the bugs will remain closed in the BTS > but > will be listed as affecting your maintainer version of the package.
Is this obsolete? In my understanding this is still how the BTS works; but I might have missed any changes. Cheers, gregor, cc'ing owner@ -- .''`. Homepage: http://info.comodo.priv.at/ - OpenPGP key 0xBB3A68018649AA06 : :' : Debian GNU/Linux user, admin, and developer - http://www.debian.org/ `. `' Member of VIBE!AT & SPI, fellow of the Free Software Foundation Europe `-
signature.asc
Description: Digital signature
