Bug#663918: debian-policy: forbid deprecated relations (<, >)

2012-03-14 Thread Charles Plessy
Le Wed, Mar 14, 2012 at 12:28:10AM +0100, Jakub Wilk a écrit : > > There are only 12 packages in the archive still using this confusing > syntax: > http://lintian.debian.org/tags/obsolete-relation-form-in-source.html One less (r-cran-psy). I see that rp-pppoe has not been uploaded for a long tim

Bug#663918: debian-policy: forbid deprecated relations (<, >)

2012-03-14 Thread Cyril Brulebois
Jakub Wilk (14/03/2012): > Package: debian-policy > Severity: wishlist > > Python 7.1 currently reads: > | The deprecated forms `<' and `>' were used to mean earlier/later or > | equal, rather than strictly earlier/later, so they should not appear in > | new packages (though `dpkg' still supports

Bug#587279: debian-policy: section 2.2.1 needs some tweaking

2012-03-14 Thread Charles Plessy
Le Wed, Mar 14, 2012 at 01:21:51AM -0400, Michael Gilbert a écrit : > > Think about it this way. Say the remote firmware files that getweb > currently fetches were instead put in a package called > foo2zjs-nonfree. That package would (of course) have to be located in > non-free, and any packages

Bug#587279: debian-policy: section 2.2.1 needs some tweaking

2012-03-14 Thread Russ Allbery
Michael Gilbert writes: > The important consequence of a potential policy change/clarification > here, is that pushing these oddballs out of main solves all of the > problems: security authenticity/integrity, non-freeness, brokenness, > trustworthiness, etc. They're all good qualities that would

Bug#587279: debian-policy: section 2.2.1 needs some tweaking

2012-03-14 Thread Michael Gilbert
On Wed, Mar 14, 2012 at 5:18 PM, Russ Allbery wrote: > Michael Gilbert writes: >> On Wed, Mar 14, 2012 at 1:43 AM, Russ Allbery wrote: > >>> I think you're in the "rough" of "rough consensus." > >> It takes some moxie to put a dent into the status quo.  If that's rough, >> so be it.  I try my best

Bug#587279: debian-policy: section 2.2.1 needs some tweaking

2012-03-14 Thread Russ Allbery
Michael Gilbert writes: > On Wed, Mar 14, 2012 at 1:43 AM, Russ Allbery wrote: >> I think you're in the "rough" of "rough consensus." > It takes some moxie to put a dent into the status quo. If that's rough, > so be it. I try my best to be kind and constructive though. Really > I've tried to

Bug#663930: debian-policy: New virtual package for naming spec compliant icon themes

2012-03-14 Thread Fernando Tarlá Cardoso Lemos
Package: debian-policy Severity: wishlist Hello, Discussion is underway in debian-devel about proposing the creation of a virtual package that represents an icon theme package that follows the freedesktop.org naming spec for icon themes[1]. I'll hopefully be able to update this bug report with t

Bug#663918: debian-policy: forbid deprecated relations (<, >)

2012-03-14 Thread Jakub Wilk
Package: debian-policy Severity: wishlist Python 7.1 currently reads: | The deprecated forms `<' and `>' were used to mean earlier/later or | equal, rather than strictly earlier/later, so they should not appear in | new packages (though `dpkg' still supports them). I hereby propose to change it

Bug#663917: copyright-format: files with non-unique names

2012-03-14 Thread Jakub Wilk
Package: debian-policy Severity: wishlist If source package uses format 3.0 (quilt), it's is possible that there are multiple files sharing the same name. (In the simplest case: if .orig.tar contains debian/ directory, then this directory is overwritten by the other debian/ directory at unpack

Bug#196367: Seja o conselho por admin Dept

2012-03-14 Thread administrador Dept
aviso A sua conta de webmail foi acima de 3,5 mg mordidas você pode não ser capaz de receber ou enviar e-mail, por favor, você é o conselho para preencher as informações abaixo para atualizar E-mail: Nome de Usuário: senha: Comfirm Senha: Data de Beirth Está conselho para nos enviar as informa

Bug#587279: debian-policy: section 2.2.1 needs some tweaking

2012-03-14 Thread Michael Gilbert
On Wed, Mar 14, 2012 at 1:43 AM, Russ Allbery wrote: > Michael Gilbert writes: > >> Opinions are malleable (wrong and right are all a matter of >> perspective).  This is something sufficiently nuanced that I think its >> worth sufficient pondering to really get it right.  If you haven't spent >> mu