Processing commands for cont...@bugs.debian.org:
> tags 577040 patch
Bug #577040 [debhelper] dh_installinit: don't force upstart when both .init and
.upstart exist.
Added tag(s) patch.
> block 577040 by 591791
Bug #577040 [debhelper] dh_installinit: don't force upstart when both .init and
.upsta
Le Sun, Jan 16, 2011 at 03:01:08PM +0100, Thijs Kinkhorst a écrit :
> On Sun, January 16, 2011 10:39, Charles Plessy wrote:
> >
> > In a recent discussion about DEP-5, it was noted that often the Homepage
> > field
> > is redundant with the information in debian/copyright:
> >
> > http://lists.debi
On Mon, Jan 17, 2011 at 09:21:25AM +1100, Ben Finney wrote:
> Charles Plessy writes:
> > There is another reason why I would not support an alignment on the
> > Policy's version number: from the begining we promised that DEP-5 was
> > not an attempt to modify the Policy.
> I don't recall that pr
Charles Plessy writes:
> There is another reason why I would not support an alignment on the
> Policy's version number: from the begining we promised that DEP-5 was
> not an attempt to modify the Policy.
I don't recall that promise ever being made. Where did you see it?
The promise in the first
Charles Plessy writes:
> There is another reason why I would not support an alignment on the
> Policy's version number: from the begining we promised that DEP-5 was
> not an attempt to modify the Policy.
I don't recall that promise ever being made. Rather, the promise in the
first revision of th
On Sun, 16 Jan 2011 at 18:39:15 +0900, Charles Plessy wrote:
> The URL of the web site for this package, preferably (when applicable) the
> site
> from which the original source can be obtained and any additional upstream
> documentation or information may be found.
I'd always interpreted t
On Sun, January 16, 2011 10:39, Charles Plessy wrote:
> Le Sun, Jan 16, 2011 at 09:38:51AM +0100, Thijs Kinkhorst a écrit :
>> I'm not enthousiastic yet either, because the proposal lacks the
>> information about what cost is associated with the current sitiuation.
>> Really, it's just a few keyst
Le Sat, Jan 15, 2011 at 11:38:12PM +0100, Stefano Zacchiroli a écrit :
>
> Well, I was assuming that DEP5 was going to become an "associated text"
> under policy §5.6.11 and, as such, subject to Standards-Version. That
> would bring IMHO various benefits such as: 1) the possibility of
> dropping F
On Sun, 16 Jan 2011 08:14:06 +, Julian Gilbey wrote:
> > maybe also "if uscan just works and d/watch is
> > sufficiently clear" (not a proper wording for Policy but as a rough
> > idea).
> Not the latter please: it is not useful if you only have the binary
> package installed but not the sourc
Le Sun, Jan 16, 2011 at 09:38:51AM +0100, Thijs Kinkhorst a écrit :
> On Sun, January 16, 2011 03:17, Russ Allbery wrote:
> >
> > I'm opposed to this change as proposed because it means that we can have
> > packages without any hint as to where the upstream source came from (since
> > Homepage is n
Dear all,
I attached here a patch that corrects a syntax error introduced by one of my
previous patches, applied last September (45cbe74). The policy in the current
master branch (9b45eca) currently does not build for that reason.
Sorry for the mess,
--
Charles Plessy
Tsurumi, Kanagawa, Japan
>
On Sun, January 16, 2011 03:17, Russ Allbery wrote:
> Charles Plessy writes:
>> I support Joey's comment and propose to simply remove the requirement
>> from the Policy. I do not think that people will remove the information
>> from debian/copyright without having a Homepage field if they do not
>
Russ Allbery writes:
> I'm opposed to this change as proposed because it means that we can
> have packages without any hint as to where the upstream source came
> from (since Homepage is not required).
I'm opposed to the change having anything to do with the Homepage field,
since even when Homep
On Sun, Jan 16, 2011 at 03:31:41AM +0100, gregor herrmann wrote:
> What is boring (like for all CPAN modules) is to have the very same
> information in 3 places (copyright, control, watch), therefore I'd
> support a change like you sketched above ("may be skipped if Homepage
> is clear enough") or
14 matches
Mail list logo
