* Russ Allbery , 2010-07-17, 18:36:
diff --git a/policy.sgml b/policy.sgml
index 0b3c1a1..029a34c 100644
--- a/policy.sgml
+++ b/policy.sgml
@@ -8273,10 +8273,14 @@ done
These two files are managed through the dpkg
- "alternatives" mechanism. Thus every package provid
Hi!
On Sat, 2010-07-17 at 18:36:50 -0700, Russ Allbery wrote:
> Here, many years later, is a proposed patch implementing that, omitting
> www-browser because it's not (yet) documented by Policy and adding
> x-terminal-emulator.
>
> Objections or seconds?
> diff --git a/policy.sgml b/policy.sgml
Stefan Ott writes:
> I would like to suggest a new virtual package, "httpd-wsgi". I'm
> currently in the process of packaging a Pylons-based web-application
> that uses wsgi and instead of manually keeping / updating a list of all
> possible implementations (eg. libapache2-mod-wsgi) it would be v
Your message dated Sat, 17 Jul 2010 19:43:35 -0700
with message-id <87aappcxwo@windlord.stanford.edu>
and subject line Re: Bug#578522: base-files: please include CDDL license text
has caused the Debian Bug report #578522,
regarding Include CDDL license in common-licenses
to be marked as done.
Your message dated Sat, 17 Jul 2010 19:42:34 -0700
with message-id <87fwzhcxyd@windlord.stanford.edu>
and subject line Re: Bug#565884: Please include CeCILL* licenses in
common-licenses
has caused the Debian Bug report #565884,
regarding Please include CeCILL* licenses in common-licenses
to be
Your message dated Sat, 17 Jul 2010 19:41:32 -0700
with message-id <87k4otcy03@windlord.stanford.edu>
and subject line Re: Bug#562920: Including Create Commons v3.0 licenses in
/usr/share/common-licenses
has caused the Debian Bug report #562920,
regarding Including Create Commons v3.0 licenses
Your message dated Sat, 17 Jul 2010 19:40:11 -0700
with message-id <87oce5cy2c@windlord.stanford.edu>
and subject line Re: Bug#541703: base-files: Please include FreeBSD license
has caused the Debian Bug report #541703,
regarding Include FreeBSD license in common-licenses
to be marked as done.
Your message dated Sat, 17 Jul 2010 19:38:33 -0700
with message-id <87sk3hcy52@windlord.stanford.edu>
and subject line Re: Bug#477428: SIL OFL should be included in common-licenses
has caused the Debian Bug report #477428,
regarding SIL OFL should be included in common-licenses
to be marked as
Your message dated Sat, 17 Jul 2010 19:37:48 -0700
with message-id <87wrstcy6b@windlord.stanford.edu>
and subject line Re: Bug#458385: New version of Artistic License
has caused the Debian Bug report #458385,
regarding Include Artistic 2.0 in common-licenses
to be marked as done.
This means th
martin f krafft writes:
> All of my packages use the AL2 for packaging. Your numbers seem off.
> I usually say
> Released under the terms of the Artistic Licence 2.0
> and I link to
> http://www.perlfoundation.org/legal/licenses/artistic-2_0.html
Since this came up, while I don't want to ma
Processing commands for cont...@bugs.debian.org:
> user debian-pol...@packages.debian.org
Setting user to debian-pol...@packages.debian.org (was r...@debian.org).
> limit package debian-policy
Limiting to bugs with field 'package' containing at least one of 'debian-policy'
Limit currently set to '
Ansgar Burchardt writes:
> perl/5.8.0-7 added /etc/perl to @INC:
> * Prepend /etc/perl to @INC to provide a standard location for
> configuration modules:
> But this addition has never been documented in the Debian Perl Policy.
> I suggest to add /etc/perl to the list of location in the "
ludovic.bre...@insalien.org writes:
> The packages gnat, gnat-3.2, gnat-3.3 and several Ada library packages
> provide Ada Library Information (*.ali) files to accompany the compiled
> (static and shared) libraries. The Ada compiler requires these files to
> be read-only for all users; otherwise,
Processing commands for cont...@bugs.debian.org:
> user debian-pol...@packages.debian.org
Setting user to debian-pol...@packages.debian.org (was r...@debian.org).
> limit package debian-policy
Limiting to bugs with field 'package' containing at least one of 'debian-policy'
Limit currently set to '
Joey Hess writes:
> Jérôme Marant wrote:
>> Joey Hess writes:
>>> editor(1) and pager(1) and www-browser(1) are already provided by at
>>> least some apternatives for those programs. If this is really a
>>> problem, which I don't think it is. Instead I think that slave links
>>> for alternatives
Processing commands for cont...@bugs.debian.org:
> user debian-pol...@packages.debian.org
Setting user to debian-pol...@packages.debian.org (was r...@debian.org).
> limit package debian-policy
Limiting to bugs with field 'package' containing at least one of 'debian-policy'
Limit currently set to '
Russ Allbery writes:
> Bill Allombert writes:
>> On Sat, Dec 12, 2009 at 04:03:23PM +0100, Bill Allombert wrote:
>>> Looking at the menu subpolicy, I believe that both vlc and bangarang
>>> belong to Applications/Video.
>> I just reported a bunch of bug reports against programs in
>> Applicatio
Processing commands for cont...@bugs.debian.org:
> user debian-pol...@packages.debian.org
Setting user to debian-pol...@packages.debian.org (was r...@debian.org).
> limit package debian-policy
Limiting to bugs with field 'package' containing at least one of 'debian-policy'
Limit currently set to '
Russ Allbery writes:
> Given these facts, I'm personally currently leaning against including
> this license in common-licenses, but I'm still open to being convinced,
> particularly if you think that a broader search for more versions of the
> license will turn up another significant cluster of p
Processing commands for cont...@bugs.debian.org:
> clone 186102 -1
Bug#186102: Suggest better date-based version numbers
Bug 186102 cloned as bug 589478.
> reassign -1 developers-reference
Bug #589478 [debian-policy] Suggest better date-based version numbers
Bug reassigned from package 'debian-po
Processing commands for cont...@bugs.debian.org:
> user debian-pol...@packages.debian.org
Setting user to debian-pol...@packages.debian.org (was r...@debian.org).
> limit package debian-policy
Limiting to bugs with field 'package' containing at least one of 'debian-policy'
Limit currently set to '
Russ Allbery writes:
> Here's a proposal that tries to implement that. Objections or seconds?
This has been merged for the next release.
> Someone may want to follow up with a patch to the devref to provide more
> details about when to choose what form of a version number and how to
> use ~ ap
4
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-policy-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
Archive: http://lists.debian.org/4c42319b.da648...@johngreen.com
23 matches
Mail list logo
