Your message dated Sat, 17 Jul 2010 19:41:32 -0700
with message-id <87k4otcy03....@windlord.stanford.edu>
and subject line Re: Bug#562920: Including Create Commons v3.0 licenses in
/usr/share/common-licenses
has caused the Debian Bug report #562920,
regarding Including Create Commons v3.0 licenses in /usr/share/common-licenses
to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the
Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith.
(NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what this
message is talking about, this may indicate a serious mail system
misconfiguration somewhere. Please contact ow...@bugs.debian.org
immediately.)
--
562920: http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=562920
Debian Bug Tracking System
Contact ow...@bugs.debian.org with problems
--- Begin Message ---
Package: base-files
Version: 5.0.0
Severity: wishlist
Hello,
In my opinion, DFSG-free Create Commons v3.0 licenses are already common enough
to be included in /usr/share/common-licenses:
CC-BY-3.0 - Creative Commons Attribution 3.0 Unported:
http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/3.0/
http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/3.0/legalcode
CC-BY-SA-3.0 - Create Commons Attribution-Share Alike 3.0 Unported:
http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-sa/3.0/
http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-sa/3.0/legalcode
-- System Information:
Debian Release: squeeze/sid
APT prefers unstable
APT policy: (500, 'unstable'), (500, 'testing'), (101, 'experimental')
Architecture: amd64 (x86_64)
Kernel: Linux 2.6.31-1-amd64 (SMP w/1 CPU core)
Locale: LANG=lt_LT.UTF-8, LC_CTYPE=lt_LT.UTF-8 (charmap=UTF-8)
Shell: /bin/sh linked to /bin/dash
Versions of packages base-files depends on:
ii base-passwd 3.5.22 Debian base system master password
ii gawk [awk] 1:3.1.6.dfsg-4 GNU awk, a pattern scanning and pr
ii mawk [awk] 1.3.3-15 a pattern scanning and text proces
base-files recommends no packages.
base-files suggests no packages.
-- no debconf information
--- End Message ---
--- Begin Message ---
Russ Allbery <r...@debian.org> writes:
> Yesterday, I did a survey of all licenses in Debian, which among other
> things attempted to locate all uses of this license by either its title
> (case-insensitive and whitespace-insensitive) or via the DEP-5 format.
> The result was 52 binary packages in the archive using CC-BY 3.0 and 79
> binary packages in the archive using CC-BY-SA 3.0.
> While we don't have any strict criteria for inclusion in
> common-licenses, this is well shy of the least-used license already
> present (the GFDL, at 875 binary packages). I don't believe either of
> these licenses used nearly frequently enough to warrant inclusion in
> common-licenses.
> I'm marking this bug as rejected accordingly, although it will stay open
> for a while in case anyone disagrees and wants to make a case for its
> inclusion.
There was some subsequent discussion of the thresholds for what should go
into common-licenses, but I don't believe anything that substantially
altered the conclusion above. I'm therefore going ahead with closing this
bug now.
--
Russ Allbery (r...@debian.org) <http://www.eyrie.org/~eagle/>
--- End Message ---
