On Mon, 2010-06-28 at 10:58 -0700, Russ Allbery wrote:
> Andrew McMillan writes:
> > On Fri, 2010-06-11 at 11:35 +0200, Santiago Vila wrote:
>
> >> Ok, I agree that it would a good idea to include GPL-1 in common-licenses
> >> because of the high number of packages still using it.
>
> > I'm sorr
On Mon, Jun 28, 2010 at 12:55 PM, Russ Allbery wrote:
> Many years later, I'm now applying the following patch to Policy for the
> next release, which spells out the existing naming convention more
> explicitly. Thanks!
>
Thanks! I appreciate the follow-up. After I saw your 3.9.0.0 policy upd
Processing commands for cont...@bugs.debian.org:
> user debian-pol...@packages.debian.org
Setting user to debian-pol...@packages.debian.org (was r...@debian.org).
> limit package debian-policy
Limiting to bugs with field 'package' containing at least one of 'debian-policy'
Limit currently set to '
Andrew McMillan writes:
> On Fri, 2010-06-11 at 11:35 +0200, Santiago Vila wrote:
>> Ok, I agree that it would a good idea to include GPL-1 in common-licenses
>> because of the high number of packages still using it.
> I'm sorry, but I disagree, for the time being. I do not believe that
> large
Kenneth Pronovici writes:
> I guess this bug could be combined into bug #114920, but I decided to
> file it separately, since I'm not sure exactly where that bug is going.
> A discussion around bug #175061 (an ITP of mine) highlights some
> confusion I had about Perl naming conventions:
>ht
5 matches
Mail list logo
