Andrew McMillan <and...@morphoss.com> writes: > On Fri, 2010-06-11 at 11:35 +0200, Santiago Vila wrote:
>> Ok, I agree that it would a good idea to include GPL-1 in common-licenses >> because of the high number of packages still using it. > I'm sorry, but I disagree, for the time being. I do not believe that > large numbers of packages are deliberately using GPL v1, and I think > that anyone who is needs to confirm that explicitly since (I hope) many > of them have moved on to less broken licenses such as GPL3 or GPL2. Hi Andrew, Did the subsequent discussion resolve your concerns about including the GPL v1 in common-licenses? I do think there are a lot of packages that are explicitly distributed under GPL v1 or later due to the Perl licensing situation. -- Russ Allbery (r...@debian.org) <http://www.eyrie.org/~eagle/> -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-policy-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org Archive: http://lists.debian.org/87sk47dopb....@windlord.stanford.edu
