Russ Allbery writes:
> I'm planning to upload Policy 3.8.5 next weekend (the delay being some
> time to make the necessary updates to Lintian and hopefully release both
> together). Please let me know if anyone sees any problems with that
> plan.
I'm going to put this off one more week, mostly
Holger Levsen writes:
> On Freitag, 18. Juni 2010, Russ Allbery wrote:
>>> I think policy is unclear here: this part of policy was added per
>>> #224509, while there is #506898 (which is unfortuantly merged with
>>> 224509, as I read it should conflict with #506898), which says that
>>> this part
Hi,
please cc: me, I'm not subscribed.
On Freitag, 18. Juni 2010, Russ Allbery wrote:
> > I think policy is unclear here: this part of policy was added per
> > #224509, while there is #506898 (which is unfortuantly merged with
> > 224509, as I read it should conflict with #506898), which says tha
Holger Levsen writes:
> Ah, thanks. You didnt quote the following sentence though:
> "However, this situation should be avoided if at all possible, since it
> prevents automated or unattended installs. In most cases, users will
> consider this to be a bug in the package."
> which is exactly my
reassign 562945 tech-ctte
# unmerge 506898 224509
# policy-maintainers, I think you should do this ^
thanks
Hi,
for those coming late to the party: this bug is about a package which fails to
install cleanly:
Unpacking runit-run (from .../runit-run_1.1.1_all.deb) ...
dpkg: error processing /v
5 matches
Mail list logo
