Hi, please cc: me, I'm not subscribed.
On Freitag, 18. Juni 2010, Russ Allbery wrote:
> > I think policy is unclear here: this part of policy was added per
> > #224509, while there is #506898 (which is unfortuantly merged with
> > 224509, as I read it should conflict with #506898), which says that this
> > part of policy contradicts with ยง3.9.1 intruduced via #206684, which
> > makes use of debconf mandatory.
>
> I don't see what's unclear or why you think these bugs should not be
> merged. Could you add more explanation?
#506898, which is merged with #224509, basically says that #224509 should not
be in policy, because it contradicts the change introduced by fixing #206684.
I suspect/"fear" that if #224509 gets closed by an upload, which brings
that "fix" into policy, #506898 also gets closed and we have a contradiction
in policy.
cheers,
Holger
signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part.
