Re: Informative addendum to policy clarifying dpkg/maintainer script interface

On Wed, Oct 21 2009, Frank Küster wrote: > Manoj Srivastava wrote: > >> Hi, >> >> I have created a document to clarify the interaction between >> maintainer scripts and dpkg, and examines the state changes for a >> package when a user interacts with the packaging system. > > Thank you,

Re: minor edits

Eric Dantan Rzewnicki writes: > I've just completed a first reading of the Debian Policy Manual > (version 3.8.3.0, 2009-08-16). Below are some suggestions for minor > edits. If it would be better to send them in some other form, please > let me know. There's nothing especially wrong with descri

Заработай на нашей работе

Нет продаж? Мы избавим Вас от проблем! Самая результативная e-mail _р а с с ы л ка_ - Ваша реклама на электронную почту Ваших новых клиентов + 7 (4 9 5 ) 2201558

Re: minor edits

Hi, Thanks for the report. I have applied fixes to all of the bugs pointed out, apart from the LinuxThreads/NPTL issue, which I think is not a typo, but a real normative bug. I think that LinuxThreads are mostly obsolete, and I think there is a bug report for the reference to be rem

Re: Informative addendum to policy clarifying dpkg/maintainer script interface

Manoj Srivastava wrote: > Hi, > > I have created a document to clarify the interaction between > maintainer scripts and dpkg, and examines the state changes for a > package when a user interacts with the packaging system. Thank you, that looks very useful. What I'm missing, however,

minor edits

Hi, I've just completed a first reading of the Debian Policy Manual (version 3.8.3.0, 2009-08-16). Below are some suggestions for minor edits. If it would be better to send them in some other form, please let me know. Thanks, Eric Rz. Footnote 1 this/these interface(s) disagreement Footnote 48