Ben Finney writes:
> Russ Allbery writes:
>> Have we reached any consensus otherwise? There's been some discussion,
>> but I've not seen anything definitive
> The discussions were rather one-sided, with one side (largely, me)
> presenting arguments that Policy should require copyright notices t
On Fri, Aug 28, 2009 at 11:40:33AM +1000, Ben Finney wrote:
> > This is "(copyright) and (distribution license)", where "copyright"
> > should be understood as "copyright statement".
> > It sounds like you may have been reading this as "(copyright and
> > distribution) license".
> Yes. I don't se
Steve Langasek writes:
> On Fri, Aug 28, 2009 at 10:24:05AM +1000, Ben Finney wrote:
> > Policy §12.5, “Copyright information”, appears to be the complete
> > set of direct normative statements of what's required:
>
> > 12.5. Copyright information
> > ---
>
> >
Russ Allbery writes:
> Ben Finney writes:
> > Both of these seem to imply that copyright notices need to be in
> > ‘debian/copyright’, but §12.5 doesn't say that at all. Am I right
> > that these assertions in §3.4 and §3.9.1 are false and should be
> > removed?
>
> Well, they're correct that co
On Fri, Aug 28, 2009 at 10:24:05AM +1000, Ben Finney wrote:
> In light of recent discussion [0] about ‘debian/copyright’ and what a
> Debian package should include in that file, I would like to see some
> clean-up of the current (residual?) assertions of what needs to be
> included.
> Policy §12.5
Ben Finney writes:
> Howdy all,
>
> In light of recent discussion [0] about ‘debian/copyright’ and what a
> Debian package should include in that file
Thanks to Cyril Brulebois for pointing out the unresolved reference
here. The discussions I'm referring to are:
[0] http://lists.debian.org/debi
Ben Finney writes:
> In light of recent discussion [0] about ‘debian/copyright’ and what a
ENOFOOTNOTE
> Debian package should include in that file, I would like to see some
> clean-up of the current (residual?) assertions of what needs to be
> included.
> There are side references that seem t
Howdy all,
In light of recent discussion [0] about ‘debian/copyright’ and what a
Debian package should include in that file, I would like to see some
clean-up of the current (residual?) assertions of what needs to be
included.
Policy §12.5, “Copyright information”, appears to be the complete set
8 matches
Mail list logo
