Julien Cristau writes:
> On Tue, Apr 7, 2009 at 05:08:38 +0200, Julien Cristau wrote:
>> how about:
>>
>>The installation of files into subdirectories of
>>/usr/X11R6/is now prohibited. Include files
>>should be installed into /usr/include/X11/. For
>>f
On Tue, Apr 7, 2009 at 05:08:38 +0200, Julien Cristau wrote:
> how about:
>
> The installation of files into subdirectories of
> /usr/X11R6/is now prohibited. Include files
> should be installed into /usr/include/X11/. For
> files that previously would
Package: debian-policy
Version: 3.8.1.0
Severity: wishlist
Tags: patch
As discussed on -devel & -policy, here's a patch to stop mentioning perl
5.6 in Depends and Build-Depends.
A reference to 5.6 remains in the “Perl 6” part, though.
Attaching the result of git format-patch against master (git
Cyril Brulebois writes:
> can we please get rid of that obsolete version requirement?
>
> More reasons in <20090421162239.gb26...@debian.org>:
> http://lists.debian.org/debian-devel/2009/04/msg00792.html
>
> (Contacting -policy since that's the address given at the bottom of the
> perl-policy p
CWD-Emarketing SolutionsHello debian-policy, If images are not visible, please
visit this online . Vote for Ajmal Mawjood No. 1, UFPAWestern Provincial
CouncilColombo District CWD-Emarketing Solutions No. 270/1, Pahala
Biyanwala, Kadawatha. Sri Lanka.Tel. +94 (0)11 2920594, Fax. +94
(0)11-481
On Wed, 22 Apr 2009, Manoj Srivastava wrote:
And this is like 6 lines of Pseudo code, and less in compact
languages like Perl. A fairly trivial exercise in basic CS logic.
Please do not insist on the number of lines. I mentioned in my
mail [1] that you need a bit more. I did not said
On Tue, Apr 21 2009, Andreas Tille wrote:
> On Tue, 21 Apr 2009, Don Armstrong wrote:
>
>> So long as we have an implementation which works for the vast majority
>> of cases we can file bugs to make it work for the few cases where it
>> doesn't. (Or the output can just be slightly broken in those
On Wed, Apr 22 2009, Stefano Zacchiroli wrote:
> On Tue, Apr 21, 2009 at 11:36:31PM +0200, Vincent Danjean wrote:
>> No. Adding blank lines before lists is also required.
>
> ... so, agreed. The extra price to pay to use Markdown would be that
> additional line insertion.
And this is lik
Package: debian-policy
Version: 3.8.1.0
Severity: wishlist
Tags: patch
Hello,
Policy 5.6.7. `Package' defines "The name of the binary package.", but
it does not seem that the format of source package names is restricted
anythere. Sanity as well as, I'd say, common use, would say source has
the s
(No need to Cc me if you keep -devel in the loop.)
gregor herrmann (21/04/2009):
> On Tue, 21 Apr 2009 18:22:39 +0200, Cyril Brulebois wrote:
>
> > > > > libdbd-sqlite3-perl (>= 1.14), libdbi-perl (>= 1.51), perl (>=
> > > > > 5.6.0-12)
> > > >
Stefano Zacchiroli writes:
> On Tue, Apr 21, 2009 at 11:36:31PM +0200, Vincent Danjean wrote:
> > No. Adding blank lines before lists is also required.
>
> ... so, agreed. The extra price to pay to use Markdown would be that
> additional line insertion.
FWIW, the use of reST as a format specifi
On Tue, Apr 21, 2009 at 11:36:31PM +0200, Vincent Danjean wrote:
> > I've the impression that you didn't read my post, I might be wrong
> > though.
> Do you read mine ?
Yes, but not the prev(prev(.)), sorry about that.
> > With that convention, you can use Markdown out of the box (on each
> > pa
12 matches
Mail list logo
