On Tue, Apr 21, 2009 at 11:36:31PM +0200, Vincent Danjean wrote: > > I've the impression that you didn't read my post, I might be wrong > > though. > Do you read mine ?
Yes, but not the prev(prev(.)), sorry about that. > > With that convention, you can use Markdown out of the box (on each > > paragraph) as long as each list is on a single paragraph (which > > sounds like a reasonable requirement to pose). > No: lots of description do not put list in a single paragraph. In > plain ASCII, it would be uggly to have a blank line before a list > introduced by a colon... The fact it would be ugly is totally subjective. I personally prefer to leave a empty line than not; FWIW Markdown has been designed on top of (perceived) mail habits, and that's why the blank line is there. But tastes are not to be discussed in a thread like this. Still you do have a point in saying that lots of description do not put list in a single paragraph. That was not my feeling, but it is true, as you can verify roughly skimming through something like: "grep -B 1 '*' /var/lib/apt/lists/*_Packages | less" Looks like half lists are on a single paragraphs, half are not. > > Note that the only pre-processor needed seems to be the one which > > separate paragraphs using the single dot we already use. > No. Adding blank lines before lists is also required. ... so, agreed. The extra price to pay to use Markdown would be that additional line insertion. Cheers. -- Stefano Zacchiroli -o- PhD in Computer Science \ PostDoc @ Univ. Paris 7 z...@{upsilon.cc,pps.jussieu.fr,debian.org} -<>- http://upsilon.cc/zack/ Dietro un grande uomo c'è ..| . |. Et ne m'en veux pas si je te tutoie sempre uno zaino ...........| ..: |.... Je dis tu à tous ceux que j'aime
signature.asc
Description: Digital signature