OEM software at greatest bargains!
Ms Office 2007, Windows Vista, Photoshop all are below $50.
Why waiting??
http://www.adobecs3for80.com
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
On Sat, Aug 04, 2007, Matthias Klose wrote:
> your own argument: expect to have commata in some DEB_BUILD_OPTIONS.
But isn't that in contradiction with splitting arguments over comma?
Your snippet would be able to parse parallel=n but the trouble would
come with trying to extract LDFLAGS from
On Sat, Aug 04, 2007, Matthias Klose wrote:
> do it without changing DEB_BUILD_OPTIONS:
What's the gain? I only see the duplication of the $(subst ) foo, and
the risk to forget that DEB_BUILD_OPTIONS might be comma-separated
later in debian/rules.
--
Loïc Minier
Loïc Minier writes:
> On Sat, Aug 04, 2007, Matthias Klose wrote:
> > do it without changing DEB_BUILD_OPTIONS:
>
> What's the gain? I only see the duplication of the $(subst ) foo, and
> the risk to forget that DEB_BUILD_OPTIONS might be comma-separated
> later in debian/rules.
your own argu
Loïc Minier writes:
> On Sat, Aug 04, 2007, Matthias Klose wrote:
> > Updated the Makefile example to work with whitespace and comma
> > separated values, without using the shell:
> > ifneq (,$(filter parallel=%,$(DEB_BUILD_OPTIONS)))
>
> I think this doesn't work as the test in the ifneq doesn't
[Loïc Minier]
> But perhaps the biggest problem is that this would block us from ever
> allowing commas as part of the DEB_BUILD_OPTIONS, for example to pass
> LDFLAGS=-Wl,something (which would work if only spaces are allowed).
Yeah, that's a good point. It may be best to amend Policy to req
On Sat, Aug 04, 2007, Matthias Klose wrote:
> Updated the Makefile example to work with whitespace and comma
> separated values, without using the shell:
> ifneq (,$(filter parallel=%,$(DEB_BUILD_OPTIONS)))
I think this doesn't work as the test in the ifneq doesn't match a
DEB_BUILD_OPTIONS with
Lucas Nussbaum writes:
> On 27/07/07 at 23:35 +0200, Wouter Verhelst wrote:
> > On Fri, Jul 27, 2007 at 04:56:14PM +0200, Matthias Klose wrote:
> > > - What to do if that option is not present? Should a package be
> > >allowed to build in parallel anyway, determing the number of
> > >proce
8 matches
Mail list logo
