Lucas Nussbaum writes: > On 27/07/07 at 23:35 +0200, Wouter Verhelst wrote: > > On Fri, Jul 27, 2007 at 04:56:14PM +0200, Matthias Klose wrote: > > > - What to do if that option is not present? Should a package be > > > allowed to build in parallel anyway, determing the number of > > > processes itself, or should it be a sequential build? > > > > I think it should behave as is currently required then; that is to say, > > make it a sequential build.
Updated the Makefile example to work with whitespace and comma separated values, without using the shell: ifneq (,$(filter parallel=%,$(DEB_BUILD_OPTIONS))) COMMA = , NUMJOBS := $(patsubst parallel=%,%,$(filter parallel=%,$(subst $(COMMA), ,$(DEB_BUILD_OPTIONS)))) MAKEFLAGS = -j $(NUMJOBS) endif -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
