Penis Enlargement Patch That Works!!!

2005-06-18 Thread Claudius
Get rid of premature ejaculation and last longer http://www.bateko.com/ss/ It's hard to be nostalgic when you can't remember anything. To pull together is to avoid being pulled apart. Remember when life's path is steep to keep your mind even. Win hearts, and you have all men's hands

Bug#314808: Incorrect directory for web applications.

2005-06-18 Thread Miguel Gea Milvaques
Package: debian-policy Version: 3.6.2.1 Severity: normal Hi, On policy 11.5.4 says: "Web Applications should try to avoid storing files in the Web Document Root. Instead they should use the /usr/share/doc/package directory for documents and register the Web Application via the doc-base package."

75% Off for All New Software.

2005-06-18 Thread Gabriel
A wide range of software applications, drivers, and more. http://pgnz.f41ciexqu7x4cyf.falseje.com Alimony: the ransom the happy pay to the devil. There are three ingredients in the good life: learning, earning, and yearning. -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject

Bug#291026: acknowledged by developer (Why is this a bug?)

2005-06-18 Thread Thomas Hood
> Why should policy example follow some other code out there, > especially if the examples shown in policy are correct? And it has > not been shown that which messes up, command -v would work > differently, but not which. I was shown earlier than which returns pathnames of files that

Bug#310113: marked as done ([ACCEPTED] SRFI 22 names for Scheme implementations)

2005-06-18 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Your message dated Sat, 18 Jun 2005 03:17:03 -0400 with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> and subject line Bug#310113: fixed in debian-policy 3.6.2.1 has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with. If this is not the case it is

Bug#313626: marked as done (x-session-manager already in use, so please add to virtual-package-names-list.txt)

2005-06-18 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Your message dated Sat, 18 Jun 2005 03:17:03 -0400 with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> and subject line Bug#313626: fixed in debian-policy 3.6.2.1 has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with. If this is not the case it is

Bug#294633: marked as done (debian-policy: please add x-display-manager to virtual-package-names-list.txt)

2005-06-18 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Your message dated Sat, 18 Jun 2005 03:17:03 -0400 with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> and subject line Bug#294633: fixed in debian-policy 3.6.2.1 has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with. If this is not the case it is

debian-policy_3.6.2.1_i386.changes ACCEPTED

2005-06-18 Thread Debian Installer
Accepted: debian-policy_3.6.2.1.dsc to pool/main/d/debian-policy/debian-policy_3.6.2.1.dsc debian-policy_3.6.2.1.tar.gz to pool/main/d/debian-policy/debian-policy_3.6.2.1.tar.gz debian-policy_3.6.2.1_all.deb to pool/main/d/debian-policy/debian-policy_3.6.2.1_all.deb Announcing to debian-deve

Bug#314569: marked as done (debian-policy: Typo in upgrading-checklist.txt.gz)

2005-06-18 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Your message dated Sat, 18 Jun 2005 03:17:03 -0400 with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> and subject line Bug#314569: fixed in debian-policy 3.6.2.1 has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with. If this is not the case it is

Processing of debian-policy_3.6.2.1_i386.changes

2005-06-18 Thread Archive Administrator
debian-policy_3.6.2.1_i386.changes uploaded successfully to localhost along with the files: debian-policy_3.6.2.1.dsc debian-policy_3.6.2.1.tar.gz debian-policy_3.6.2.1_all.deb Greetings, Your Debian queue daemon -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of "un