Your message dated Sat, 18 Jun 2005 03:17:03 -0400 with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> and subject line Bug#310113: fixed in debian-policy 3.6.2.1 has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with. If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith. (NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what I am talking about this indicates a serious mail system misconfiguration somewhere. Please contact me immediately.) Debian bug tracking system administrator (administrator, Debian Bugs database) -------------------------------------- Received: (at submit) by bugs.debian.org; 21 May 2005 17:56:51 +0000 >From [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sat May 21 10:56:51 2005 Return-path: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Received: from mail01.hansenet.de (webmail.hansenet.de) [213.191.73.61] by spohr.debian.org with esmtp (Exim 3.35 1 (Debian)) id 1DZYDT-00084a-00; Sat, 21 May 2005 10:56:51 -0700 Received: from sarg.kollektiv-hamburg.de (213.39.187.236) by webmail.hansenet.de (7.2.059) (authenticated as [EMAIL PROTECTED]) id 4271B1D30033B951 for [EMAIL PROTECTED]; Sat, 21 May 2005 19:56:50 +0200 Received: from localhost (forcix.kollektiv-hamburg.de [192.168.1.40]) by sarg.kollektiv-hamburg.de (Postfix) with ESMTP id 6C1171B4032 for <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>; Sat, 21 May 2005 19:55:52 +0200 (CEST) Received: from forcer by localhost with local (Exim 4.50) id 1DZYDR-0004bj-UU for [EMAIL PROTECTED]; Sat, 21 May 2005 19:56:49 +0200 To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: [VIRTUAL PACKAGE] SRFI 22 names for Scheme implementations From: Jorgen Schaefer <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Date: Sat, 21 May 2005 19:56:49 +0200 Message-ID: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> User-Agent: Gnus/5.11 (Gnus v5.11) Emacs/22.0.50 (gnu/linux) MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Delivered-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 2.60-bugs.debian.org_2005_01_02 (1.212-2003-09-23-exp) on spohr.debian.org X-Spam-Status: No, hits=-8.0 required=4.0 tests=BAYES_00,HAS_PACKAGE autolearn=no version=2.60-bugs.debian.org_2005_01_02 X-Spam-Level: Package: debian-policy Version: 3.6.1.1 Severity: wishlist The Scheme Request For Implementation (SRFI) process has in SRFI 22 standardized multiple binary names for the interpretation of Scheme scripts. This led to the creation of a small policy for Scheme programs posted to debian-devel: http://lists.debian.org/debian-devel/2005/04/msg01000.html No replies were received. This is the bug report to create the virtual packages mentioned in the policy at http://people.debian.org/~forcer/debian-scheme-policy/debian-scheme-policy.html/ The names and short descriptions are: scheme-r4rs Scheme interpreter with the R4RS environment scheme-r5rs Scheme interpreter with the R5RS environment scheme-ieee-11878-1900 Scheme interpreter with the IEEE-11878-1900 environment scheme-srfi-0 Scheme interpreter accepting the SRFI 0 language extension scheme-srfi-7 Scheme interpreter accepting the SRFI 7 language scheme-srfi-55 Scheme interpreter accepting the SRFI 55 language extension I will repost and wait some time whether any discussion happens this time. Thanks, -- Jorgen -- Debian GNU/Linux Developer [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://www.forcix.cx/ --------------------------------------- Received: (at 310113-close) by bugs.debian.org; 18 Jun 2005 07:22:27 +0000 >From [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sat Jun 18 00:22:26 2005 Return-path: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Received: from newraff.debian.org [208.185.25.31] (mail) by spohr.debian.org with esmtp (Exim 3.35 1 (Debian)) id 1DjXer-0007Of-00; Sat, 18 Jun 2005 00:22:26 -0700 Received: from katie by newraff.debian.org with local (Exim 3.35 1 (Debian)) id 1DjXZf-0006kc-00; Sat, 18 Jun 2005 03:17:03 -0400 From: Manoj Srivastava <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] X-Katie: $Revision: 1.56 $ Subject: Bug#310113: fixed in debian-policy 3.6.2.1 Message-Id: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Sender: Archive Administrator <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Date: Sat, 18 Jun 2005 03:17:03 -0400 Delivered-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 2.60-bugs.debian.org_2005_01_02 (1.212-2003-09-23-exp) on spohr.debian.org X-Spam-Status: No, hits=-6.0 required=4.0 tests=BAYES_00,HAS_BUG_NUMBER autolearn=no version=2.60-bugs.debian.org_2005_01_02 X-Spam-Level: Source: debian-policy Source-Version: 3.6.2.1 We believe that the bug you reported is fixed in the latest version of debian-policy, which is due to be installed in the Debian FTP archive: debian-policy_3.6.2.1.dsc to pool/main/d/debian-policy/debian-policy_3.6.2.1.dsc debian-policy_3.6.2.1.tar.gz to pool/main/d/debian-policy/debian-policy_3.6.2.1.tar.gz debian-policy_3.6.2.1_all.deb to pool/main/d/debian-policy/debian-policy_3.6.2.1_all.deb A summary of the changes between this version and the previous one is attached. Thank you for reporting the bug, which will now be closed. If you have further comments please address them to [EMAIL PROTECTED], and the maintainer will reopen the bug report if appropriate. Debian distribution maintenance software pp. Manoj Srivastava <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> (supplier of updated debian-policy package) (This message was generated automatically at their request; if you believe that there is a problem with it please contact the archive administrators by mailing [EMAIL PROTECTED]) -----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- Hash: SHA1 Format: 1.7 Date: Sat, 18 Jun 2005 00:48:14 -0500 Source: debian-policy Binary: debian-policy Architecture: source all Version: 3.6.2.1 Distribution: unstable Urgency: low Maintainer: Debian Policy List <debian-policy@lists.debian.org> Changed-By: Manoj Srivastava <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Description: debian-policy - Debian Policy Manual and related documents Closes: 294633 310113 313626 314569 Changes: debian-policy (3.6.2.1) unstable; urgency=low . * Bug fix: "debian-policy: Typo in upgrading-checklist.txt.gz", thanks to Romain Francoise. Added the missing /. (Closes: #314569). * Bug fix: "x-session-manager already in use, so please add to virtual-package-names-list.txt", thanks to Christopher Martin (Closes: #313626). * Bug fix: "[ACCEPTED] SRFI 22 names for Scheme implementations", thanks to Jorgen Schaefer (Closes: #310113). * Bug fix: "debian-policy: please add x-display-manager to virtual-package-names-list.txt", thanks to Jon Dowland (Closes: #294633). Files: 9c39227b5b89b19fcff2b5c8566a8a78 821 doc optional debian-policy_3.6.2.1.dsc 4bd5fd31eeb8fd85f34111d1b83783c7 1172247 doc optional debian-policy_3.6.2.1.tar.gz cd77a19cd6b56f32b68bc05d953e124c 1616178 doc optional debian-policy_3.6.2.1_all.deb -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1.4.1 (GNU/Linux) iD8DBQFCs8ShIbrau78kQkwRAnTNAJ9dJQP7yVRKRPCyaAUgN/5YysuykgCdG3uK cosqxEjPIV68hflsSWyiKMg= =2h4v -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]