-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Wouter Verhelst wrote:
> On Sun, Jun 12, 2005 at 04:00:17PM +0900, Junichi Uekawa wrote:
>
>>Hi,
Hi
[...]
> Anyway. Thanks to your excellent research in
> <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> in this bug (and your reminder on IRC
> that you did this :-), we know tha
Do you want to see real amateurs who have webcams
on their computers in their dorm rooms? This is
not one of those sites with professional girls who
get paid to do this in front of the camera, these
are the average girls next door, at college, trying
to make money and meet guys!
Get free acce
On Sun, Jun 12, 2005 at 01:18:42PM +0200, Marco d'Itri wrote:
> On Jun 12, Wouter Verhelst <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> > <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> to say the target should be
> > "patched", rather than "source". For reference, the proposal as it now
> > reads follows; as always, I'm looking for secon
Bill Allombert <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
>> I'm not sure I understand what you mean with "testsuite" for this?
>
> Probably Junichi was refering to a set of tests that would allow to check if
> a scheme interpretor come close to actually accept the SRFI 7 language,
> and so is a valid candidate
On Sun, Jun 12, 2005 at 01:06:10PM +0200, Bill Allombert wrote:
> There are essentially two ways to use patch systems like dpatch: In
> debian/rules have 'clean' depend on 'unpatch' or on 'patch'. While the
> standard way is to depend on 'unpatch', if you make it depends on
> 'patch', then all pat
On Sun, Jun 12, 2005 at 03:49:30PM +0200, Jorgen Schaefer wrote:
> Junichi Uekawa <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
>
> A more complex example using scheme-srfi-7 (requiring SRFI-8,
> SRFI-23 and SRFI-37) is available at
> http://people.debian.org/~forcer/debian-scheme-policy/sdd2debiandoc.scm
> and was
Junichi Uekawa <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
>> After one week of no discussion on debian-devel or here, I just
>> retitled this as ACCEPTED. That means that these names and
>> descriptions are the "consensus" reached as required by
>> virtual-packages-names-list.txt.
>>
>> Thanks to everyone who p
On Sun, Jun 12, 2005 at 08:56:25PM +0900, Junichi Uekawa wrote:
> Hi,
>
> > I would like to make one comment:
> >
> > There are essentially two ways to use patch systems like dpatch: In
> > debian/rules have 'clean' depend on 'unpatch' or on 'patch'. While the
> > standard way is to depend on 'u
Hi,
> I would like to make one comment:
>
> There are essentially two ways to use patch systems like dpatch: In
> debian/rules have 'clean' depend on 'unpatch' or on 'patch'. While the
> standard way is to depend on 'unpatch', if you make it depends on
> 'patch', then all patches are applied by
On Sun, Jun 12, 2005 at 11:24:04AM +0200, Wouter Verhelst wrote:
> +
> + If, even after this warning, a maintainer still chooses to
> + do so by either creating the layout of the source package
> + such that running dpkg-source -x does not
> + render editable source, or
On Jun 12, Wouter Verhelst <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> to say the target should be
> "patched", rather than "source". For reference, the proposal as it now
> reads follows; as always, I'm looking for seconds.
I object. If the standard "patched" target exists then README.source
On Sun, Jun 12, 2005 at 04:00:17PM +0900, Junichi Uekawa wrote:
> Hi,
>
> > That being said, a recent post on -devel by Lars Wirzenius[1] made me
> > realize that this problem is about more than (c)dbs; thus, I've changed
> > the concept to make it broader.
> >
> > I'm hereby rescinding all previ
Hi,
> After one week of no discussion on debian-devel or here, I just
> retitled this as ACCEPTED. That means that these names and
> descriptions are the "consensus" reached as required by
> virtual-packages-names-list.txt.
>
> Thanks to everyone who participated both in the original private
> di
Hi,
> That being said, a recent post on -devel by Lars Wirzenius[1] made me
> realize that this problem is about more than (c)dbs; thus, I've changed
> the concept to make it broader.
>
> I'm hereby rescinding all previous proposals I made on #250202, to
> replace them with the following:
Your p
14 matches
Mail list logo
