Hi,
> I would like to make one comment:
>
> There are essentially two ways to use patch systems like dpatch: In
> debian/rules have 'clean' depend on 'unpatch' or on 'patch'. While the
> standard way is to depend on 'unpatch', if you make it depends on
> 'patch', then all patches are applied by "dpkg-source -x" and you don't
> need the 'patched' target anymore. The cost on implementing the
> 'patched' target is higher than fixing the 'clean' dependency.
>
> There are some cases like dbs where this will not work, so 'patched' is
> still worthwhile, but before asking the other packages to implement
> 'patched', we should consider to ask them implementing 'clean: patch'
> instead.
Hmm..
There are more packages than dpatch and dbs floating around
in Debian; and I consider it to be a step forward to move this way,
rather than trying to fix each patching script.
regards,
junichi
--
Junichi Uekawa, Debian Developer http://www.netfort.gr.jp/~dancer/
183A 70FC 4732 1B87 57A5 CE82 D837 7D4E E81E 55C1
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
