Re: Policy for devfs support

2005-03-26 Thread Marco d'Itri
On Mar 26, Roger Leigh <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Is there a project-wide policy for support for devfs (and devfs-style, > e.g. udev devfs.rules) device naming? No, but nearly all packages support both conventions. > I'm asking because of obstruction (from upstream) regarding the > application

Re: Policy for devfs support

2005-03-26 Thread Henrique de Moraes Holschuh
On Sat, 26 Mar 2005, Roger Leigh wrote: > Is there a project-wide policy for support for devfs (and devfs-style, > e.g. udev devfs.rules) device naming? Do it if you can. It is not mandated anywhere, but it is clearly a very good idea. We should even make it a *may* in policy to stress this, I su

Policy for devfs support

2005-03-26 Thread Roger Leigh
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 Is there a project-wide policy for support for devfs (and devfs-style, e.g. udev devfs.rules) device naming? I'm asking because of obstruction (from upstream) regarding the application of a simple patch to allow yaboot to support it: http://bugs.debi