-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- Hash: SHA1 Is there a project-wide policy for support for devfs (and devfs-style, e.g. udev devfs.rules) device naming?
I'm asking because of obstruction (from upstream) regarding the application of a simple patch to allow yaboot to support it: http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=300950 If there was a definite policy of supporting it (or not), this would be easier. As it stands, the tool is not properly functional on devfs systems. Since we should aim to support a well-integrated system, I'm not happy that folks can deliberately obstruct furthering the integration of the system. Regards, Roger - -- Roger Leigh Printing on GNU/Linux? http://gimp-print.sourceforge.net/ Debian GNU/Linux http://www.debian.org/ GPG Public Key: 0x25BFB848. Please sign and encrypt your mail. -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1.4.0 (GNU/Linux) Comment: Processed by Mailcrypt 3.5.8 <http://mailcrypt.sourceforge.net/> iD8DBQFCRWL8VcFcaSW/uEgRAuTuAKCNIMJm4FenZfpjih37UOmZRNbaYwCeI6lh Hhv608yjEuM1oTRieRBZF10= =+pee -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
