Bug#254998: reopen

reopen 254998 severity 254998 wishlist thanks > The fact that dpkg does not follow what the policy recommends > is by no means a policy bug. It also is not clear that section 9.4 > applies to dpkg in the first place (dpkg is not an initscript). I agree that this is not a policy bug; that is why

Processed: reopen

Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]: > reopen 254998 Bug#254998: Please follow policy 9.4 in printing "working" messages with ellipses ("...") Bug reopened, originator not changed. > severity 254998 wishlist Bug#254998: Please follow policy 9.4 in printing "working" messages with ellipses

Bug#225465: marked as done (debian-policy: packages must give choice to not start at boot, via debconf)

Your message dated Fri, 04 Feb 2005 21:13:20 -0600 with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> and subject line debian-policy: packages must give choice to not start at boot, via debconf has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt wit

Processed: rejecting old proposal

Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]: > retitle 224509 [REJECTED 2005/02/04] Correct spurious promise regarding TTY > availability Bug#224509: [PROPOSAL] Correct spurious promise regarding TTY availability Changed Bug title. > tags 224509 +fixed Bug#224509: [REJECTED 2005/02/04] Correct spu

Bug#240665: marked as done ([PROPOSAL] require depending on split-off packages)

Your message dated Fri, 04 Feb 2005 20:48:45 -0600 with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> and subject line [PROPOSAL] require depending on split-off packages has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with. If this is not the cas

Processed: Fixed in CVS

Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]: > tags 239359 +pending Bug#239359: debian-policy: virtual package: flexmem There were no tags set. Tags added: pending > -- Stopping processing here. Please contact me if you need assistance. Debian bug tracking system administrator (administrator, Deb

CVS srivasta: Added virtual package flexmem, anything that can access flexible

CVSROOT:/cvs/debian-policy Module name:debian-policy Changes by: srivastaFri Feb 4 19:55:47 MST 2005 Modified files: debian : changelog . : virtual-package-names-list.txt Log message: Added virtual package flexmem, anything that ca

Processed: Fixed in CVS

Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]: > tags 146023 +pending Bug#146023: [ACCEPTED 2005/02/04] "libexec", or use of "lib" for binaries in lib* packages There were no tags set. Tags added: pending > -- Stopping processing here. Please contact me if you need assistance. Debian bug tracking

CVS srivasta: Add a recommendation for the location for run-time support material,

CVSROOT:/cvs/debian-policy Module name:debian-policy Changes by: srivastaFri Feb 4 18:48:54 MST 2005 Modified files: debian : changelog . : upgrading-checklist.html policy.sgml Log message: Add a recommendation for the location for

Processed: Three seconds, and essentially no dissent

Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]: > severity 146023 normal Bug#146023: [PROPOSAL]: "libexec", or use of "lib" for binaries in lib* packages Severity set to `normal'. > retitle 146023 [ACCEPTED 2005/02/04] "libexec", or use of "lib" for binaries > in lib* packages Bug#146023: [PROPOSAL]:

Bug#241919: marked as done (debconf: deletion of /var/cache/debconf causes error)

Your message dated Fri, 04 Feb 2005 19:25:43 -0600 with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> and subject line Modify FHS to be clearer has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with. If this is not the case it is now your responsib

Bug#268377: marked as done (replace Architecture field with Cpu And System fields (see #291939))

Your message dated Fri, 04 Feb 2005 19:13:58 -0600 with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> and subject line Bug#268377: Bug#291939: Support for arch aliases has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with. If this is not the case

lonely ?

hi, I'm a girl who just made her own website :) Most of the time pretty lonely, since I hate rude people :/.. thought came to my mind to build my own webpage with my photos and videos. I have this site for fun All it needs is age verification.. Come check my pics and videos in there.. visit

Processed: Fixed in CVS

Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]: > tags 270020 +pending Bug#270020: debian-policy: virtual package request: mpd-client There were no tags set. Tags added: pending > -- Stopping processing here. Please contact me if you need assistance. Debian bug tracking system administrator (adminis

Bug#290270: debian-policy: please clarify/loosen the policy on rewriting history

Hi, Policy merely states that this is "usually" best rectified with a new entry, and that one should not be "rewriting history". This is not even a recommendation, it seems to be an expression of opinion; I've now moved it to a footnote. manoj -- A fanatic is a person who can'

CVS srivasta: Added virtual package mpd-client, for the music playing daemon control clients.

CVSROOT:/cvs/debian-policy Module name:debian-policy Changes by: srivastaFri Feb 4 18:04:07 MST 2005 Modified files: debian : changelog . : virtual-package-names-list.txt Log message: Added virtual package mpd-client, for the music

Processed: Fixed in CVS

Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]: > tags 290270 +pending Bug#290270: debian-policy: please clarify/loosen the policy on rewriting history There were no tags set. Tags added: pending > -- Stopping processing here. Please contact me if you need assistance. Debian bug tracking system admi

Processed: Fixed in CVS

Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]: > tags 291026 +pending Bug#291026: 9.3.3.2 "command -v" example needs tweaking There were no tags set. Tags added: pending > -- Stopping processing here. Please contact me if you need assistance. Debian bug tracking system administrator (administrator,

CVS srivasta: Moved the opinion that one should add new changelog items, rather than

CVSROOT:/cvs/debian-policy Module name:debian-policy Changes by: srivastaFri Feb 4 17:55:20 MST 2005 Modified files: debian : changelog . : policy.sgml Log message: Moved the opinion that one should add new changelog items, rather

CVS srivasta: Added an instance if what recovery is attempted if error unwind itself

CVSROOT:/cvs/debian-policy Module name:debian-policy Changes by: srivastaFri Feb 4 17:37:19 MST 2005 Modified files: debian : changelog . : policy.sgml Log message: Added an instance if what recovery is attempted if error unwind it

Bug#254998: marked as done (Please follow policy 9.4 in printing "working" messages with ellipses ("..."))

Your message dated Fri, 04 Feb 2005 18:05:06 -0600 with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> and subject line This is not a policy bug. has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with. If this is not the case it is now your responsi

Processed: Fixed in CVS

Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]: > tags 286549 +pending Bug#286549: debian-policy: Detailed description of maintainer script calls (Section 6.5) is incomplete There were no tags set. Tags added: pending > -- Stopping processing here. Please contact me if you need assistance. Debian b

Processed: fixed in CVS

Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]: > tags 284967 +pending Bug#284967: debian-policy: should not ship generated files in source archive, and should clean them from the tree There were no tags set. Tags added: pending > thanks Stopping processing here. Please contact me if you need assist

CVS srivasta: Move the error unwind eaxmple out the item in the postinst script

CVSROOT:/cvs/debian-policy Module name:debian-policy Changes by: srivastaFri Feb 4 16:44:55 MST 2005 Modified files: debian : rules changelog . : policy.sgml Log message: Move the error unwind eaxmple out the item in the postinst s

Bug#286549: A demonstration

reopen 286549 thanks Manoj wrote: > Indeed, looking at the code, I see no basis for that > statement, so I am closing this report. Please reopen it if you can > demonstrate from dpkg source that policy is indeed incomplete. I can demonstrate it by experiment. I created a dummy package f

Processed: A demonstration

Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]: > reopen 286549 Bug#286549: debian-policy: Detailed description of maintainer script calls (Section 6.5) is incomplete Bug reopened, originator not changed. > thanks Stopping processing here. Please contact me if you need assistance. Debian bug tracki

Bug#286549: marked as done (debian-policy: Detailed description of maintainer script calls (Section 6.5) is incomplete)

Your message dated Fri, 04 Feb 2005 12:40:30 -0600 with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> and subject line Bug#286549: Clarification of #286549 has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with. If this is not the case it is now yo

Re: Mail Delivery (failure [EMAIL PROTECTED])

Sehr geehrte Damen und Herren, es tut uns leid Ihnen mitteilen zu müssen, da Wolfram Rühe Müller nicht mehr für den Pilzgarten arbeitet. Wenn sie eine E-Mail an den Pilzgarten schicken möchten, tun sie dies bitte unter [EMAIL PROTECTED] . Wir freuen uns darauf von Ihnen zu hören! Das freundlic

heyy

how are you, I'm a girl who just made her own website :) Alot of the times I feel lonely due to the fact that I don't got mr. right .. thought came to my mind to have a site where I can finally expose my body. I love to do webcam shows on my site. All it needs is age verification.. Come check