On Wed, 12 Mar 2003, Drew Scott Daniels wrote:
> Since I'm reading debian-policy
> anyway, I figured the document couldn't hurt having a little polish put on
> it. I'm enjoying reading the document and checking it's semantics.
But not its punctuation, I hope.
> I believe that the best solution
On Wed, 12 Mar 2003, Chris Waters wrote:
> On Wed, Mar 12, 2003 at 02:06:05PM -0600, Drew Scott Daniels wrote:
> > Package: debian-policy
>
> > 2.3.9.1 Prompting in maintainer scripts says:
> > "Prompting may be accomplished by hand, or by communicating with a
> > program, such as debconf, which c
On Wed, Mar 12, 2003 at 02:06:05PM -0600, Drew Scott Daniels wrote:
> Package: debian-policy
> 2.3.9.1 Prompting in maintainer scripts says:
> "Prompting may be accomplished by hand, or by communicating with a
> program, such as debconf, which conforms to the Debian Configuration
> management spec
Package: debian-policy
Severity: minor
2.4.3 says:
"This makes it impossible for someone else to later reconfigure the
package." This is an incorrect statement and is likely an intentional
exaggeration.
A statement like:
"This could make it very difficult for someone else to later reconfigure
the
Package: debian-policy
Severity: minor
Footnote 6 says:
"4% of Debian packages [see Debconf stats] currently use debconf"
Two minor bugs, but should I really bother submitting different bug
reports?
http://kitenet.net/programs/debconf/stats/ says:
"Whups, you want to go here. " and points to
htt
Package: debian-policy
2.3.9.1 Prompting in maintainer scripts says:
"Prompting may be accomplished by hand, or by communicating with a
program, such as debconf, which conforms to the Debian Configuration
management specification, version 2 or higher."
The grammar is ambiguous and "by hand" is va
On Tue, 11 Mar 2003, Osamu Aoki wrote:
> On Tue, Mar 11, 2003 at 03:57:07PM -0600, Drew Scott Daniels wrote:
> > Package: debian-policy
> >
> > Section 2.3.1 says:
> > "Package names must consist of lower case letters (a-z), digits (0-9),
> > plus (+) and minus (-) signs, and periods (.)."
> >
> >
On Tue, Mar 11, 2003 at 07:48:11PM -0800, Osamu Aoki wrote:
> On Tue, Mar 11, 2003 at 03:57:07PM -0600, Drew Scott Daniels wrote:
> > Package: debian-policy
> >
> > Section 2.3.1 says:
> > "Package names must consist of lower case letters (a-z), digits (0-9),
> > plus (+) and minus (-) signs, and
On Tue, Mar 11, 2003 at 07:48:11PM -0800, Osamu Aoki wrote:
> On Tue, Mar 11, 2003 at 03:57:07PM -0600, Drew Scott Daniels wrote:
> > Package: debian-policy
> >
> > Section 2.3.1 says:
> > "Package names must consist of lower case letters (a-z), digits (0-9),
> > plus (+) and minus (-) signs, and
> > dlopening with RTDL_GLOBAL, where there is an option to
> > dlopen with RTDL_LOCAL.
>
> hmm... how does that behaves when the conflict is two or more libs down the
> chain from the PoV of the stuff being dlopened?
I have thought that symbols are resolved locally, as to allow
modules to be li
10 matches
Mail list logo
