Jérôme Marant wrote:
> Joey Hess <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
>
> > Josip Rodin wrote:
> >> Think harder. :) A user runs man x-window-manager once, sees something,
> >> later the alternative gets changes to another WM for whatever reason, they
> >> run man x-window-manager again, see another thing,
Jérôme Marant wrote:
> Joey Hess <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
>
> > Jerome Marant wrote:
> >> I've sent a patch for Debhelper (See #85963) but it won't be applied
> >> as long as Policy don't say so.
> >
> > When did I say that? I am still unhappy with the implementation in
> > debhelper, is all. (
Marco d'Itri <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> écrivait :
« On Mar 09, Claudio Cattazzo <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
«
« >Do you think Italian translation of the Policy would be useful?
« No, it's wasted time. Developers are supposed to know english anyway.
« I think your time would be spent better at
Joey Hess <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> Josip Rodin wrote:
>> Think harder. :) A user runs man x-window-manager once, sees something,
>> later the alternative gets changes to another WM for whatever reason, they
>> run man x-window-manager again, see another thing, confusion ensues.
>
> editor(1)
Joey Hess <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> Jerome Marant wrote:
>> I've sent a patch for Debhelper (See #85963) but it won't be applied
>> as long as Policy don't say so.
>
> When did I say that? I am still unhappy with the implementation in
> debhelper, is all. (Modify policy to get rid of the /usr/
On Sun, Mar 09, 2003 at 11:18:36AM -0500, Joey Hess wrote:
> > Think harder. :) A user runs man x-window-manager once, sees something,
> > later the alternative gets changes to another WM for whatever reason, they
> > run man x-window-manager again, see another thing, confusion ensues.
>
> editor(
On Mar 09, Claudio Cattazzo <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>Do you think Italian translation of the Policy would be useful?
No, it's wasted time. Developers are supposed to know english anyway.
I think your time would be spent better at translating something useful
to our users.
--
ciao,
Marco
On Fri, Mar 07, 2003 at 12:50:25PM -0500, Stephen Frost wrote:
> Hey all,
>
> Please excuse the (minor) cross-post but I think the technical
> committee needs to find an answer and that answer then be set in
> policy.
>
> We need to make a decision on how to properly handle multiple libra
Do you think Italian translation of the Policy would be useful?
On Sun, Mar 09, 2003 at 05:43:19PM +0100, Josip Rodin wrote:
> On Sun, Mar 09, 2003 at 05:33:03PM +0100, Claudio Cattazzo wrote:
> > We're starting the Italian translation of the Debian Policy and we'd like
> > to upload the files to
Josip Rodin wrote:
> Think harder. :) A user runs man x-window-manager once, sees something,
> later the alternative gets changes to another WM for whatever reason, they
> run man x-window-manager again, see another thing, confusion ensues.
editor(1) and pager(1) and www-browser(1) are already pro
On Sun, Mar 09, 2003 at 02:53:10PM +0100, Jérôme Marant wrote:
> >> Currently, some window managers like IceWM or Sawfish, provide an
> >> alternative to x-window-manager.1. It would be consistent to add this
> >> to the policy since window managers provide an alternative to
> >> x-window-manager a
Jerome Marant wrote:
> I've sent a patch for Debhelper (See #85963) but it won't be applied
> as long as Policy don't say so.
When did I say that? I am still unhappy with the implementation in
debhelper, is all. (Modify policy to get rid of the /usr/X11R6/man/ tree,
and I would be able to implemen
> "Anthony" == Anthony Towns writes:
Anthony> On Sat, Mar 08, 2003 at 04:16:47PM -0500, Sam Hartman
Anthony> wrote:
>> I think that we should implement versioned symbols.
Anthony> Uhh, versioned symbols means that programs built on
Anthony> Debian systems won't run elsewh
Josip Rodin <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> On Sun, Mar 09, 2003 at 01:38:46PM +0100, Jerome Marant wrote:
>> Currently, some window managers like IceWM or Sawfish, provide an
>> alternative to x-window-manager.1. It would be consistent to add this
>> to the policy since window managers provide an a
On Sun, Mar 09, 2003 at 01:38:46PM +0100, Jerome Marant wrote:
> Currently, some window managers like IceWM or Sawfish, provide an
> alternative to x-window-manager.1. It would be consistent to add this
> to the policy since window managers provide an alternative to
> x-window-manager as well.
Sin
Package: debian-policy
Version: 3.5.8.0
Severity: normal
Currently, policy says:
-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-
12.8.4 Packages providing a window manager
Packages that provide a window manager should declare in their control
data that they provide the virtual package x-window-manager. They
should also regist
On Sat, Mar 08, 2003 at 04:16:47PM -0500, Sam Hartman wrote:
> I think that we should implement versioned symbols.
Uhh, versioned symbols means that programs built on Debian systems won't
run elsewhere. That's not something we should be doing, except in very
specific cases where the gain outweig
17 matches
Mail list logo
