Package: debian-policy Version: 3.5.8.0 Severity: normal Currently, policy says:
-=-=-=-=-=-=-=- 12.8.4 Packages providing a window manager Packages that provide a window manager should declare in their control data that they provide the virtual package x-window-manager. They should also register themselves as an alternative for /usr/bin/x-window-manager, with a priority calculated as follows: -=-=-=-=-=-=-=- Currently, some window managers like IceWM or Sawfish, provide an alternative to x-window-manager.1. It would be consistent to add this to the policy since window managers provide an alternative to x-window-manager as well. I've sent a patch for Debhelper (See #85963) but it won't be applied as long as Policy don't say so. Regards, -- System Information: Debian Release: testing/unstable Architecture: i386 Kernel: Linux chinon 2.4.18-xfs #1 ven mar 15 20:09:10 CET 2002 i686 Locale: [EMAIL PROTECTED], LC_CTYPE=ISO-8859-15 (ignored: LC_ALL set) -- no debconf information
