On Tue, 18 Feb 2003, Julian Gilbey wrote:
> > binary: binary-arch binary-indep
> > binary-arch: apt libapt-pkg-dev apt-utils
> > binary-indep: apt-doc libapt-pkg-doc
> > apt: build
> > libapt-pkg-dev: build
> > apt-utils: build
> > apt-doc: build-doc
> > libapt-pkg-doc: build-doc
>
> But if you ha
On Tue, Feb 18, 2003 at 12:20:49PM -0600, Adam Heath wrote:
> > Great! What do you mean by "split mode", though, and does this mean
> > that we must have something like "debian/rules -q build-arch"
> > returning a meaningful value?
>
> No, it means that build-indep is built during the binary-inde
On Tue, 18 Feb 2003, Julian Gilbey wrote:
> On Fri, Feb 14, 2003 at 12:23:50AM -0600, Adam Heath wrote:
> > On Tue, 11 Feb 2003, Julian Gilbey wrote:
> >
> > > So given how few packages we are talking about, would it be worth the
> > > buildds using all packages specified in both Build-Depends and
On Fri, Feb 14, 2003 at 12:23:50AM -0600, Adam Heath wrote:
> On Tue, 11 Feb 2003, Julian Gilbey wrote:
>
> > So given how few packages we are talking about, would it be worth the
> > buildds using all packages specified in both Build-Depends and
> > Build-Depends-Indep and phasing out Build-Depen
4 matches
Mail list logo
