On Tue, 18 Feb 2003, Julian Gilbey wrote: > On Fri, Feb 14, 2003 at 12:23:50AM -0600, Adam Heath wrote: > > On Tue, 11 Feb 2003, Julian Gilbey wrote: > > > > > So given how few packages we are talking about, would it be worth the > > > buildds using all packages specified in both Build-Depends and > > > Build-Depends-Indep and phasing out Build-Depends-Indep? > > > > I modified apt's build earlier this week to work in split mode. I'll also > > be > > making certain dpkg does as well. Please don't phase it out. > > Great! What do you mean by "split mode", though, and does this mean > that we must have something like "debian/rules -q build-arch" > returning a meaningful value?
No, it means that build-indep is built during the binary-indep rule(which build deps on). binary: binary-arch binary-indep binary-arch: apt libapt-pkg-dev apt-utils binary-indep: apt-doc libapt-pkg-doc apt: build libapt-pkg-dev: build apt-utils: build apt-doc: build-doc libapt-pkg-doc: build-doc
