On Wed, Feb 05, 2003 at 02:46:27PM +1100, Anand Kumria wrote:
> What is the opinion of this group?
>
> Anand
As Joey pointed out, but with one addition:
Source: debian-policy
Section: doc
Priority: optional
Maintainer: Debian Policy List
Uploaders: Julian Gilbey <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>,
Manoj Sr
On 5 Feb 2003, Josip Rodin <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Please look at the bug list before filing bugs, this has already been
> noticed. (And fixed in CVS.)
I did read the list, but obviously I missed it. Sorry
--
Martin
>>"Brian" == Brian White <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
>> >>"Brian" == Brian White <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> The original conversation I had waaay back with the webserver guys
> is that they wouldn't go ahead with these changes until it _was_ official
> policy. If you require it to be d
CVSROOT:/cvs/debian-policy
Module name:debian-policy
Changes by: joy Wed Feb 5 07:24:31 MST 2003
Modified files:
. : policy.sgml
Log message:
fixed a typo noticed by Amos Shapira; slightly updated the verbiage to remove
some confusing redundancy in th
On Wed, Feb 05, 2003 at 08:26:38AM +0200, Amos Shapira wrote:
> In section 13.1 "Manual Pages" third paragraph begins with:
>
> "There should be a manual page at for every program at the very least".
>
> I think the first "at" is out of order.
Thanks, this will be fixed in the next version.
--
CVSROOT:/cvs/debian-policy
Module name:debian-policy
Changes by: joy Wed Feb 5 07:14:00 MST 2003
Modified files:
. : policy.sgml upgrading-checklist.html
debian : changelog
Log message:
wrapping up #87510
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
> merge 174048 179900
Bug#174048: 13.3: wrong path in paragraph "Packages must not require ..."
Bug#179900: debian-policy: apparent typo under "Additional documentation"?
Merged 174048 179900.
> thanks
Stopping processing here.
Please contact me if you
merge 174048 179900
thanks
On Thu, Feb 06, 2003 at 12:04:10AM +1100, Martin Pool wrote:
> > Packages must not require the existance of any files in
> > /usr/share/doc/ in order to function [60]. Any files that are
> > referenced by programs but are also useful as standalone documentation
> > shoul
Package: debian-policy
Version: unavailable; reported 2003-02-06
Severity: normal
Tags: patch
The "Additional documentation" section says:
> Packages must not require the existance of any files in
> /usr/share/doc/ in order to function [60]. Any files that are
> referenced by programs but are als
Hi,
In section 13.1 "Manual Pages" third paragraph begins with:
"There should be a manual page at for every program at the very least".
I think the first "at" is out of order.
I saw this in http://www.debian.org/doc/debian-policy/ch-docs.html#s13.1
Cheers,
--Amos
"Of course Australia was mar
10 matches
Mail list logo
