>>"Brian" == Brian White <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
>> >>"Brian" == Brian White <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> The original conversation I had waaaaaaay back with the webserver guys
> is that they wouldn't go ahead with these changes until it _was_ official
> policy. If you require it to be done before it becomes official policy
> then we have a chicken & egg problem. In my opinion, they're right
> and it should be policy before the change gets made.
> However, since it's now an accepted ammendment, I filed bugs against
> the webserver packages yesterday and directed them towards this bug
> number if they want to read the background material.
I think the way policy is handled has changed since the early
days; and perhaps polling the web server folks would yeild different
results?
> Still, I'd like to proceed on making the policy change to the official
> policy statement at the same time. Since it's been approved, we might
> as well proceed on both fronts at the same time.
Well, since the /usr/doc fiasco, policy has tended not to move
and lead the changes, and have policy being used to beat developers over
the head with. (urggh, my grammar, she is missing).
Any progress?
manoj
--
If computers take over (which seems to be their natural tendency), it
will serve us right. Alistair Cooke
Manoj Srivastava <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> <http://www.debian.org/%7Esrivasta/>
1024R/C7261095 print CB D9 F4 12 68 07 E4 05 CC 2D 27 12 1D F5 E8 6E
1024D/BF24424C print 4966 F272 D093 B493 410B 924B 21BA DABB BF24 424C
