On Sat, 2003-02-01 at 17:10, Joey Hess wrote:
> As far as I can see, this proposal has one conditional second (from aph
> pending an impact study), and some discussion, and has been stalled
> since mid-January. It also looks to me, from reading the thread, that
> we have an easy consensus on just
As far as I can see, this proposal has one conditional second (from aph
pending an impact study), and some discussion, and has been stalled
since mid-January. It also looks to me, from reading the thread, that
we have an easy consensus on just changing policy to upgrade the
suggestion to use debco
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
> reassign 84473 debian-policy
Bug#84473: please document typical 'hints' and where to find them
Bug reassigned from package `menu' to `debian-policy'.
> thanks!
Stopping processing here.
Please contact me if you need assistance.
Debian bug tracking sy
Hello Debian policy,
I do not like /etc/profile.d idea because I am a zsh user and every
implementation I saw so far were completly broken if your shell was not bash.
-- Either /etc/profile.d applied only to bash, but why discriminating
users of other shell (zsh,tcsh,etc...) ?
-- Either /etc/pr
4 matches
Mail list logo