Your message dated Sun, 1 Dec 2002 00:23:29 +0100 (CET)
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line Ignore the bugreport - my fault
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now yo
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
> reassign 171221 debian-policy
Bug#171221: openmotif: openmotif is not a native package
Bug reassigned from package `openmotif' to `debian-policy'.
> quit
Stopping processing here.
Please contact me if you need assistance.
Debian bug tracking system a
reassign 171221 debian-policy
quit
On Sat, Nov 30, 2002 at 11:42:27PM +0100, Gerd Knorr wrote:
> > On Sat, Nov 30, 2002 at 05:24:58PM +0100, Gerd Knorr wrote:
> > >
> > > "should" or "must"? I can't find anything in the policy saying
> > > I *must* package it this way, it just says it is usually
> On Sat, Nov 30, 2002 at 05:24:58PM +0100, Gerd Knorr wrote:
> >
> > "should" or "must"? I can't find anything in the policy saying
> > I *must* package it this way, it just says it is usually done this
> > way. Thus I hereby close that bug.
>
> It is specified in C.3.
Well, it is exactly tha
Package: debian-policy
Version: 3.5.8.0
Severity: minor
/usr/share/doc/debian-policy/upgrading-checklist.txt.gz line 125 refer to
[11.7.3] regarding examples.
The proper reference is [13.6].
- Jonas
-- System Information:
Debian Release: testing/unstable
Architecture: powerpc
Kernel: Linux au
reopen 171221
quit
On Sat, Nov 30, 2002 at 05:24:58PM +0100, Gerd Knorr wrote:
>
> "should" or "must"? I can't find anything in the policy saying
> I *must* package it this way, it just says it is usually done this
> way. Thus I hereby close that bug.
It is specified in C.3.
> I didn't modify
7 matches
Mail list logo