Your message dated Sun, 1 Dec 2002 00:23:29 +0100 (CET)
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line Ignore the bugreport - my fault
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.

This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the
Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith.

(NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what I am
talking about this indicates a serious mail system misconfiguration
somewhere.  Please contact me immediately.)

Debian bug tracking system administrator
(administrator, Debian Bugs database)

--------------------------------------
Received: (at submit) by bugs.debian.org; 30 Nov 2002 21:57:17 +0000
>From [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sat Nov 30 15:57:15 2002
Return-path: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Received: from 0x503e3fed.bynxx5.adsl-dhcp.tele.dk (auryn.jones.dk) 
[80.62.63.237] 
        by master.debian.org with esmtp (Exim 3.12 1 (Debian))
        id 18IFbv-0001If-00; Sat, 30 Nov 2002 15:57:15 -0600
Received: by auryn.jones.dk (Postfix, from userid 1000)
        id B293426B2E; Sat, 30 Nov 2002 22:56:43 +0100 (CET)
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
From: Jonas Smedegaard <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: Debian Bug Tracking System <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Subject: debian-policy: upgrading-checklist should point to 13.6 regarding
        examples, not 11.7.3
Reply-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
X-Mailer: reportbug 2.9
Date: Sat, 30 Nov 2002 22:56:43 +0100
Message-Id: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Delivered-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
X-Spam-Status: No, hits=0.6 required=5.0
        tests=SPAM_PHRASE_00_01
        version=2.41
X-Spam-Level: 

Package: debian-policy
Version: 3.5.8.0
Severity: minor

/usr/share/doc/debian-policy/upgrading-checklist.txt.gz line 125 refer to 
[11.7.3] regarding examples.

The proper reference is [13.6].

 - Jonas

-- System Information:
Debian Release: testing/unstable
Architecture: powerpc
Kernel: Linux auryn 2.4.19-powerpc #1 Mon Sep 9 09:01:43 EDT 2002 ppc
Locale: LANG=da_DK, LC_CTYPE=da_DK

-- no debconf information


---------------------------------------
Received: (at 171292-done) by bugs.debian.org; 30 Nov 2002 23:24:00 +0000
>From [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sat Nov 30 17:24:00 2002
Return-path: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Received: from 0x503e3fed.bynxx5.adsl-dhcp.tele.dk (auryn.jones.dk) 
[80.62.63.237] 
        by master.debian.org with esmtp (Exim 3.12 1 (Debian))
        id 18IGxs-0007Bb-00; Sat, 30 Nov 2002 17:24:00 -0600
Received: from localhost (auryn.jones.dk [127.0.0.1])
        by auryn.jones.dk (Postfix) with ESMTP id 24DBE26B4A
        for <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>; Sun,  1 Dec 2002 00:23:29 +0100 (CET)
Date: Sun, 1 Dec 2002 00:23:29 +0100 (CET)
From: Jonas Smedegaard <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Ignore the bugreport - my fault
Message-ID: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII
Delivered-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
X-Spam-Status: No, hits=-3.8 required=5.0
        tests=SIGNATURE_SHORT_DENSE,SPAM_PHRASE_00_01,USER_AGENT_PINE
        version=2.41
X-Spam-Level: 

I didn't pay enough attention. It was not a bug after all...

 - Jonas

-- 
Jonas Smedegaard (+45 40843136)          http://dr.jones.dk/~jonas/
Spiff ApS (= IT-guide dr. Jones ApS)     http://dr.jones.dk/
Debian GNU/Linux developer               http://people.debian.org/~js/

Reply via email to