On Sat, Nov 16, 2002 at 12:34:43AM +0900, Akira TAGOH wrote:
> > On Fri, 15 Nov 2002 13:27:49 +0100,
> > "BA" == Bill Allombert <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> >> Subject: debian-policy: provides the exception of static libraries.
> >> In Libraries section,
> >>
> >> In general, libraries
On Sat, Nov 16, 2002 at 06:11:51PM -0800, Osamu Aoki wrote:
> > --- policy.sgml.orig2002-11-12 12:50:40.0 +
> > +++ policy.sgml 2002-11-12 12:51:30.0 +
> > + There should be a manual page at least for every program. If
> > + no manual page is available,
>>"Josip" == Josip Rodin <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
Josip> Surprisingly enough, we have yet to put any mention of
Josip> doc-base into the Policy. A lot of the packages that need it
Josip> use it by now[1], so it appears to be working properly. It
Josip> would be useful if it was "legalized"
On Sun, Nov 17, 2002 at 02:01:29AM +, Colin Watson wrote:
> > Packages that would deserve a bug are those that which have additional docs
> > but have registered it only with dhelp or such (ew!) or that have it but
> > haven't registered it.
>
> It would be cool if somebody could figure out ho
> --- policy.sgml.orig 2002-11-12 12:50:40.0 +
> +++ policy.sgml 2002-11-12 12:51:30.0 +
> + There should be a manual page at least for every program. If
> + no manual page is available, this is considered as a bug and
> + should be reported to the
On Sun, Nov 17, 2002 at 02:07:15AM +0100, Josip Rodin wrote:
> Packages that would deserve a bug are those that which have additional docs
> but have registered it only with dhelp or such (ew!) or that have it but
> haven't registered it.
It would be cool if somebody could figure out how to fix #1
On Sat, Nov 16, 2002 at 07:16:40PM -0600, Manoj Srivastava wrote:
> >> That change makes over 90% of the packages on my machine
> >> instantly buggy, for not following a should directive.
>
> Josip> No, it wouldn't. This part of policy wouldn't apply to
> Josip> packages that have nothing to d
>>"Josip" == Josip Rodin <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
>>
>> That change makes over 90% of the packages on my machine
>> instantly buggy, for not following a should directive.
Josip> No, it wouldn't. This part of policy wouldn't apply to
Josip> packages that have nothing to do with it.
Josip
Hi,
>>"Josip" == Josip Rodin <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
Josip> Surprisingly enough, we have yet to put any mention of
Josip> doc-base into the Policy. A lot of the packages that need it
Josip> use it by now[1], so it appears to be working properly. It
Josip> would be useful if it was "legaliz
On Sat, Nov 16, 2002 at 06:42:37PM -0600, Manoj Srivastava wrote:
> Josip> Surprisingly enough, we have yet to put any mention of
> Josip> doc-base into the Policy. A lot of the packages that need it
> Josip> use it by now[1], so it appears to be working properly. It
> Josip> would be useful if
Package: debian-policy
Severity: wishlist
Hi,
Surprisingly enough, we have yet to put any mention of doc-base into the
Policy. A lot of the packages that need it use it by now[1], so it appears
to be working properly. It would be useful if it was "legalized" by the
Policy Manual so that new maint
Fax No:234-1-7597602
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Greetings,
I crave your indulgence as I contact you in such a surprising manner.
But I respectfully insist you read this letter carefully as I
am optimistic it will open doors for unimaginable financial reward for both of
us.
This business transactio
12 matches
Mail list logo
