Your message dated Thu, 05 Sep 2002 21:03:15 -0500
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line This is not a policy bug
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your responsib
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
> clone 159642 -1 -2 -3
Bug#159642: dpkg-source: still complains about Enhances fields
Bug 159642 cloned as bugs 159744-159746.
> reassign -1 debian-policy
Bug#159744: dpkg-source: still complains about Enhances fields
Bug reassigned from package `dpkg-d
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
> severity 159642 wishlist
Bug#159642: dpkg-source: still complains about Enhances fields
Severity set to `wishlist'.
> reassign 159642 dpkg-dev
Bug#159642: dpkg-source: still complains about Enhances fields
Bug reassigned from package `debian-policy' to
severity 159642 wishlist
reassign 159642 dpkg-dev
thanks
Hi,
This has nothing to do with policy. Indeed, this seems like a
legitimate wishlist: it is a request for a feature in dpkg-dev; and
one which has been generally accepted as a Nice Thing To Have.
Is there a problem with
On Thu, Sep 05, 2002 at 01:06:11AM -0500, Manoj Srivastava wrote:
> Isn't this premature to send this for policy creation?
> Shouldn't we work out a solution, implement it, work out the kinks,
> and _then_ make policy about it?
The bug references the menu policy which is in debian-poli
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
> reassign 159642 debian-policy
Bug#159642: dpkg-source: still complains about Enhances fields
Bug reassigned from package `dpkg-dev' to `debian-policy'.
> thanks
Stopping processing here.
Please contact me if you need assistance.
Debian bug tracking s
Your message dated Thu, 05 Sep 2002 01:02:09 -0500
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line Bug#127809: dpkg doesn't know about Enhances: - yes it does
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is no
Hi,
Isn't this premature to send this for policy creation?
Shouldn't we work out a solution, implement it, work out the kinks,
and _then_ make policy about it?
manoj
--
I never vote for anyone. I always vote against. W.C. Fields
Manoj Srivastava <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Hi,
I don't see why this is a bug at all, whether in dpkg or in
policy. As wichert mentioned in another thread, dpkg is more than a
mere implementation of policy. And policy is more than a mere
documentation for dpkg and apt.
Policy mentions enhances as a means of declaring a
9 matches
Mail list logo