[no subject]

2002-08-19 Thread Æ®À©½º

Re: /usr/doc link

2002-08-19 Thread Peter Palfrader
On Mon, 19 Aug 2002, Andrew Suffield wrote: > in /usr/doc/package. To realize a > smooth migration to > /usr/share/doc/package, each package > + added a symlink /usr/doc/package > + that pointed to the new location of its documentation in > + /usr/shar

Bug#157131: Bug#113525: Bug#157131: [PROPOSAL] Suggest to minimize optimization when DEB_BUILD_OPTIONS contains "debug"

2002-08-19 Thread Richard Braakman
On Sun, Aug 18, 2002 at 08:18:43PM -0400, Colin Walters wrote: > + Although binaries in the build tree should be compiled with > + debugging information by default, Note that many packages don't currently do this. I often had to do horrible things to Makefiles to get a binary with de

Bug#157131: Bug#113525: Bug#157131: [PROPOSAL] Suggest to minimize optimization when DEB_BUILD_OPTIONS contains "debug"

2002-08-19 Thread Colin Walters
On Mon, 2002-08-19 at 18:07, Bdale Garbee wrote: > I note a typo in the first line of your change: > > + By default, when a package is being built, it any binaries > > Want to lose the word 'it' in that line? Yep, good catch. Thanks.

Bug#157131: Bug#113525: Bug#157131: [PROPOSAL] Suggest to minimize optimization when DEB_BUILD_OPTIONS contains "debug"

2002-08-19 Thread Bdale Garbee
[EMAIL PROTECTED] (Colin Walters) writes: > Any seconds? I note a typo in the first line of your change: + By default, when a package is being built, it any binaries Want to lose the word 'it' in that line? Other than that, I second this proposal. Bdale

Re: /usr/doc link

2002-08-19 Thread Andrew Suffield
On Mon, Aug 19, 2002 at 02:39:00PM -0400, Joey Hess wrote: > Henrique de Moraes Holschuh wrote: > > On Mon, 19 Aug 2002, Oliver Elphick wrote: > > > Are we still supposed to maintain the /usr/share/doc/x -> /usr/doc/x > > > link for uploads to sarge? > > > > No. > > Of course policy still says we

Bug#157131: Bug#113525: Bug#157131: [PROPOSAL] Suggest to minimize optimization when DEB_BUILD_OPTIONS contains "debug"

2002-08-19 Thread James Troup
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 Colin Walters <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > Any seconds? seconded. - -- James -BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE- Version: GnuPG v1.0.6 (GNU/Linux) Comment: Processed by Mailcrypt 3.5.6 iEYEARECAAYFAj1hVZYACgkQgD/uEic

Re: Bug#157131: [PROPOSAL] Suggest to minimize optimization when DEB_BUILD_OPTIONS contains "debug"

2002-08-19 Thread Peter Palfrader
On Mon, 19 Aug 2002, Steve Kowalik wrote: > At 10:59 pm, Monday, August 19 2002, Colin Walters mumbled: > > I kind of suspected so, but not having access to authoritative data I > > didn't want to try to change two things at once. Well, here's an > > updated patch which combines both then. I als

Re: /usr/doc link

2002-08-19 Thread Henrique de Moraes Holschuh
On Mon, 19 Aug 2002, Joey Hess wrote: > Of course policy still says we must. I don't know when we want to change > that; now or when a lot of packages have stopped including it, or what. Well, if we simply change policy not to say anything, then including it is not against policy. Later we forbid

Re: /usr/doc link

2002-08-19 Thread Joey Hess
Henrique de Moraes Holschuh wrote: > On Mon, 19 Aug 2002, Oliver Elphick wrote: > > Are we still supposed to maintain the /usr/share/doc/x -> /usr/doc/x > > link for uploads to sarge? > > No. Of course policy still says we must. I don't know when we want to change that; now or when a lot of packa

Re: /usr/doc link

2002-08-19 Thread Henrique de Moraes Holschuh
On Mon, 19 Aug 2002, Oliver Elphick wrote: > Are we still supposed to maintain the /usr/share/doc/x -> /usr/doc/x > link for uploads to sarge? No. -- "One disk to rule them all, One disk to find them. One disk to bring them all and in the darkness grind them. In the Land of Redmond where t

Bug#157131: PROPOSAL] Suggest to minimize optimization when DEB_BUILD_OPTIONS contains "debug"

2002-08-19 Thread Oohara Yuuma
On Mon, 19 Aug 2002 13:05:18 +0200, Ivo Timmermans <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Julian Gilbey wrote: > > Good point. May in some cases be worth adding, though, if upstream > > makefiles add -O2 automatically. > Same goes for -fno-omit-frame-pointer I heard when I was in the NM queue that -fomit-fr

/usr/doc link

2002-08-19 Thread Oliver Elphick
Are we still supposed to maintain the /usr/share/doc/x -> /usr/doc/x link for uploads to sarge? -- Oliver Elphick[EMAIL PROTECTED] Isle of Wight, UK http://www.lfix.co.uk/oliver GPG: 1024D/3E1D0C1C: CA12 09E0 E8D5 8870 5839 932A 614D 4C

Bug#157131: [PROPOSAL] Suggest to minimize optimization when DEB_BUILD_OPTIONS contains "debug"

2002-08-19 Thread Steve Kowalik
At 10:59 pm, Monday, August 19 2002, Colin Walters mumbled: > I kind of suspected so, but not having access to authoritative data I > didn't want to try to change two things at once. Well, here's an > updated patch which combines both then. I also removed some old cruft > about a.out and -N. > >

Re: Bug#157131: PROPOSAL] Suggest to minimize optimization when DEB_BUILD_OPTIONS contains "debug"

2002-08-19 Thread Anthony Towns
On Mon, Aug 19, 2002 at 01:14:31PM +0200, Josip Rodin wrote: > On Sun, Aug 18, 2002 at 06:48:24PM -0500, Branden Robinson wrote: > > (BTW, someone's mailer is a complete piece of crap. What the F is up > > with mangling the subject line like that?) > The BTS doesn't like the [ at the start of the

Bug#157131: PROPOSAL] Suggest to minimize optimization when DEB_BUILD_OPTIONS contains "debug"

2002-08-19 Thread Josip Rodin
On Sun, Aug 18, 2002 at 06:48:24PM -0500, Branden Robinson wrote: > (BTW, someone's mailer is a complete piece of crap. What the F is up > with mangling the subject line like that?) The BTS doesn't like the [ at the start of the Subject line, for some reason. -- 2. That which causes joy or

Bug#157131: PROPOSAL] Suggest to minimize optimization when DEB_BUILD_OPTIONS contains "debug"

2002-08-19 Thread Ivo Timmermans
Julian Gilbey wrote: > On Mon, Aug 19, 2002 at 09:19:02AM +0900, Oohara Yuuma wrote: > > -O0 is the default of gcc. Why do I have to add it explicitly? > > I don't want a bug filed just because -O0 is missing. > > Good point. May in some cases be worth adding, though, if upstream > makefiles add

Bug#157131: PROPOSAL] Suggest to minimize optimization when DEB_BUILD_OPTIONS contains "debug"

2002-08-19 Thread Julian Gilbey
On Mon, Aug 19, 2002 at 09:19:02AM +0900, Oohara Yuuma wrote: > On 18 Aug 2002 18:16:43 -0400, > Colin Walters <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > + noopt > > + > > + > > + The presence of this string means that the package > > + should be complied with the minu

Bug#157131: PROPOSAL] Suggest to minimize optimization when DEB_BUILD_OPTIONS contains "debug"

2002-08-19 Thread Colin Walters
On Sun, 2002-08-18 at 20:19, Oohara Yuuma wrote: > -O0 is the default of gcc. Why do I have to add it explicitly? Well, you don't strictly speaking have to do anything yet; DEB_BUILD_OPTIONS is a recommendation of policy, not a requirement. Anyways, I just mentioned adding -O0 just for clarity'