On Mon, Aug 19, 2002 at 09:19:02AM +0900, Oohara Yuuma wrote:
> On 18 Aug 2002 18:16:43 -0400,
> Colin Walters <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > + <tag>noopt</tag>
> > + <item>
> > + <p>
> > + The presence of this string means that the package
> > + should be complied with the minumum possible amount of
> > + optimization. For C programs, this usually implies
> > + adding <tt>-O0</tt> to <tt>CFLAGS</tt>. Some programs
> > + might fail to build or run at this level of
> > + optimization; it may be necessary to use <tt>-O1</tt>.
> > + </p>
> > + </item>
> -O0 is the default of gcc. Why do I have to add it explicitly?
> I don't want a bug filed just because -O0 is missing.
Good point. May in some cases be worth adding, though, if upstream
makefiles add -O2 automatically.
Julian
--
=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-
Julian Gilbey, Dept of Maths, Queen Mary, Univ. of London
website: http://www.maths.qmul.ac.uk/~jdg/
Debian GNU/Linux Developer, see: http://people.debian.org/~jdg/
Visit http://www.thehungersite.com/ to help feed the hungry
