Re: command -v in postinsts violating policy

2002-05-27 Thread Clint Adams
> The simplest way, of course, is to state in the release notes that > zsh, although POSIX-compliant (is it really?) should not be used as Is bash really POSIX-compliant? Is ash? Is pdksh? -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PRO

Re: command -v in postinsts violating policy

2002-05-27 Thread Robert Bihlmeyer
Branden Robinson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > Let me be perfectly clear: > > KEEP YOUR HANDS OFF OF XFREE86. Chill. Nobody will touch your preciousss. Anyway, what prevents the documentation of existing practise in policy? I.e. inserting an additional dependency on "command -v", perhaps to be