Branden Robinson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > Let me be perfectly clear: > > KEEP YOUR HANDS OFF OF XFREE86.
Chill. Nobody will touch your preciousss. Anyway, what prevents the documentation of existing practise in policy? I.e. inserting an additional dependency on "command -v", perhaps to be deleted when we figure out a better alternative. The simplest way, of course, is to state in the release notes that zsh, although POSIX-compliant (is it really?) should not be used as /bin/sh. -- Robbe
signature.ng
Description: PGP signature
