Bug#111025: debian-policy: typo in chapter 9: ldconfig and pre/post scripts

2001-09-06 Thread Herbert Xu
Steve Greenland <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > On 06-Sep-01, 06:59 (CDT), Herbert Xu <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: >> >> BTW, what is it with all the Steves in this thread? :) > Is your problem that there are so many of us, or that we seem to be > excessively dim? I personally blame insufficient caff

Bug#111025: debian-policy: typo in chapter 9: ldconfig and pre/post scripts

2001-09-06 Thread Steve Greenland
On 06-Sep-01, 03:28 (CDT), Herbert Xu <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Steve Greenland <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: >> >> I thought we just established that calling ldconfig during 'postinst >> upgrade' is wrong. Therefore, "all packages simply doing a ldconfig > > Where did we establish that? Please p

Re: Bug#111025: debian-policy: typo in chapter 9: ldconfig and pre/post scripts

2001-09-06 Thread Steve Greenland
On 06-Sep-01, 06:59 (CDT), Herbert Xu <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > BTW, what is it with all the Steves in this thread? :) Is your problem that there are so many of us, or that we seem to be excessively dim? I personally blame insufficient caffiene... Steve Greenland (No offense intended to M

Bug#111025: debian-policy: typo in chapter 9: ldconfig and pre/post scripts

2001-09-06 Thread Herbert Xu
Branden Robinson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > On Tue, Sep 04, 2001 at 08:53:20PM -0400, Steve M. Robbins wrote: >> Perhaps the intention of the section 9 paragraph (above) was to >> say >> >> However, the postrm script must not call ldconfig if invoked >> with the argument "upgrade",

Bug#111025: debian-policy: typo in chapter 9: ldconfig and pre/post scripts

2001-09-06 Thread Herbert Xu
Steve Greenland <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > On 05-Sep-01, 16:52 (CDT), Herbert Xu <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: >> Vociferous Mole <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: >> >> > So? Isn't it a bug? This isn't a case of a policy change creating a bug, >> > but of a existing bug being highlighted by the policy c

Bug#109171: Use Maildir format by default

2001-09-06 Thread Brian May
> "Raul" == Raul Miller <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: Raul> Use quoted-printable. Ok, I didn't realize that quoted printable coped with this. My experimentation shows that a line starting with From is turned into "=46rom" (using mutt). Not very readable to a human reader, but at least any

Bug#109171: Use Maildir format by default

2001-09-06 Thread Raul Miller
> "Raul" == Raul Miller <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > Raul> Also note that mbox format need not be lossy -- MDA should > Raul> quote with > any line matching regexp "^>*From ", MUA should > Raul> always remove one level of quoting at display time. Any > Raul> software not follo