On 04 Sep 2001 12:38:32 +1000, Brian May wrote:
> Scott> critical or grave issues. Put other information in either
> Scott> the README.Debian or other documentation, such as the
> Scott> release notes.
> Strongly disagree for a number of reasons. Remember, that
> README.Debian isn't av
> "Scott" == Scott Dier <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
Scott> Elements A possibly common user error could be
Scott> helped by inserting information into a debconf information
Scott> dialog before a long list of choices or it could be
I have not yet read the rest of the repli
Dear Friend, Our Hits Against Hunger
site was so successful we are continuing it as www.helpthehungry.org. Help the Hungry
will be the largest grassroots effort ever to end hunger in
America. Our organization is completely non-profit, and we will
continue to give $1 for every hit on the site
Package: debian-policy
Version: 3.5.6.0
Severity: minor
I have just had a bug filed on a package I recently adopted (#27),
my new version of which replaces the /usr/share/doc/foo directory with a
symlink to /usr/share/doc/bar, where foo depends on bar. This is
because both foo and bar build fr
Scott Dier wrote:
> One Possible Solution
> -
> Remove most informational displays from debconf that aren't relating to
> critical or grave issues. Put other information in either the README.Debian
> or other documentation, such as the release notes.
FWIW, the note data type i
On Sun, Sep 02, 2001 at 01:01:29PM -0700, Ian Zimmerman wrote:
> As for b), if the system determined my card was S3V based and used that
> information to filter down the choices just to
> xserver-{svga,s3,xfree86} I would be happy. But I don't know if this
> is presently possible with debconf - i.
Steve M. Robbins <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> --- policy.sgml.origSun Sep 2 22:50:21 2001
> +++ policy.sgml Sun Sep 2 22:52:26 2001
> @@ -3718,7 +3718,7 @@
>
>
>
> - However, postrm and preinst scripts
> + However, postrm and postinst scripts
>must not call
7 matches
Mail list logo
