Bug#108416: Format of short description should be mandated

2001-08-18 Thread Joey Hess
Branden Robinson wrote: > Since you're fond of statistics, here are some for woody/main/i386: > > $ grep '^Description:' Packages | wc -l >6126 > $ grep '^Description:' Packages | sort | uniq | wc -l >5848 > $ grep '^Description:' Packages | fold -w 93 | wc -l >6126 Unsuprising, since

Bug#109182: Removing more historical cruft

2001-08-18 Thread Cesar Eduardo Barros
Package: debian-policy Version: 3.5.6.0 Severity: wishlist Some time ago (ok, a lot of time ago), lots of things were changed in the filesystem (I can particulary recall the gradual phasing-out and elimination of /usr/tmp and /var/adm). Now I think it's time to go on and move some more things. Th

Bug#109171: Use Maildir format by default

2001-08-18 Thread Cesar Eduardo Barros
Package: debian-policy Version: 3.5.6.0 Severity: wishlist Debian uses the traditional mailbox style by default. However, it has some disadvantages over maildir -- one of them is that it does a non-reversible modification to the message's text if it contains the sequence 'From ' at the beginning o

Processed: Bug#100346: [ACCEPTED 2001-08-18] permitting shared versions of libraries to not exist

2001-08-18 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]: > retitle 100346 [ACCEPTED 2001-08-18] permitting shared versions of libraries > to not exist Bug#100346: [AMENDMENT 2001-07-30] permitting shared versions of libraries to not exist Changed Bug title. > forwarded 100346 [EMAIL PROTECTED] Bug#100346: [A

Bug#100346: ACCEPTED 2001-08-18] permitting shared versions of libraries to not exist

2001-08-18 Thread Branden Robinson
retitle 100346 [ACCEPTED 2001-08-18] permitting shared versions of libraries to not exist forwarded 100346 [EMAIL PROTECTED] thanks There has been no further discussion of this proposed amendemnt within the discussion period, therefore it is marked as accepted. -- G. Branden Robinson

Bug#72335: marked as done ([ACCEPTED 10/6/2001] Optional build-arch and build-indep targets for debian/rules)

2001-08-18 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Your message dated Sat, 18 Aug 2001 23:28:24 +0100 with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> and subject line Closed by debian-policy version 3.5.6.0 has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with. If this is not the case it is now

Bug#105538: marked as done (section C.2.3(in html format) has an incorrectly formated changelog example)

2001-08-18 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Your message dated Sat, 18 Aug 2001 23:28:24 +0100 with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> and subject line Closed by debian-policy version 3.5.6.0 has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with. If this is not the case it is now

Bug#53849: marked as done ([SEE 102204] emacs/tex downgrading to optional)

2001-08-18 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Your message dated Sat, 18 Aug 2001 23:28:24 +0100 with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> and subject line Closed by debian-policy version 3.5.6.0 has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with. If this is not the case it is now

Bug#102204: marked as done ([ACCEPTED 2001/07/11] Downgrade emacs/tex to optional)

2001-08-18 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Your message dated Sat, 18 Aug 2001 23:28:24 +0100 with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> and subject line Closed by debian-policy version 3.5.6.0 has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with. If this is not the case it is now

Bug#100631: marked as done ([AMMENDMENT 28/06/2001] Restrict http access to /usr/share/d=)

2001-08-18 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Your message dated Sat, 18 Aug 2001 23:28:24 +0100 with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> and subject line Closed by debian-policy version 3.5.6.0 has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with. If this is not the case it is now

Bug#109166: Policy has two parts called "Shared libraries"

2001-08-18 Thread Josip Rodin
Package: debian-policy Version: 3.5.6 Severity: minor Hi, Policy has two parts called "Shared libraries", it's chapter 9 and section 11.3. This is very minor :) but still a wee bit inconsistent, they should probably be merged or renamed. -- 2. That which causes joy or happiness.

Bug#60461: marked as done ([SEE 98291] FHS conformance not explicit)

2001-08-18 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Your message dated Sat, 18 Aug 2001 23:28:24 +0100 with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> and subject line Closed by debian-policy version 3.5.6.0 has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with. If this is not the case it is now

Bug#102199: marked as done ([ACCEPTED 2001/07/11] Next stage in usr/doc -> usr/share/doc transition)

2001-08-18 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Your message dated Sat, 18 Aug 2001 23:28:24 +0100 with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> and subject line Closed by debian-policy version 3.5.6.0 has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with. If this is not the case it is now

Bug#105535: marked as done (debian-policy should not be concerned with the internal structure of a source package)

2001-08-18 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Your message dated Sat, 18 Aug 2001 23:28:24 +0100 with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> and subject line Closed by debian-policy version 3.5.6.0 has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with. If this is not the case it is now

Bug#105625: marked as done (Spelling correction)

2001-08-18 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Your message dated Sat, 18 Aug 2001 23:28:24 +0100 with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> and subject line Closed by debian-policy version 3.5.6.0 has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with. If this is not the case it is now

Bug#98291: marked as done ([ACCEPTED 16/06/2001] Clarifying FHS policy)

2001-08-18 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Your message dated Sat, 18 Aug 2001 23:28:24 +0100 with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> and subject line Closed by debian-policy version 3.5.6.0 has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with. If this is not the case it is now