Bug#66023: PROPOSAL] Re: Shared libs vs. plugins.

2001-04-28 Thread Manoj Srivastava
>>"Richard" == Richard Braakman <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: Richard> On Sat, Apr 28, 2001 at 12:37:22PM -0500, Manoj Srivastava wrote: >> +to by third party executables (binaries of other packages), >> +should be installed in the subdirectories of the Richard>

Re: CVS jdg: * Make # in closes: regexp optional, as in latest dpkg-dev

2001-04-28 Thread Julian Gilbey
On Fri, Apr 27, 2001 at 12:18:52PM -0400, Peter S Galbraith wrote: > > Log message: > > * Make # in closes: regexp optional, as in latest dpkg-dev > > So debian-changelog-mode.el should change its font-lock regexp > such that # is optional now? This is a done deal? Yep. File a bug report! J

CVS srivasta: TeX got confused by the new perl regexpo in policy; had to create a woraround to package policy

2001-04-28 Thread debian-policy
CVSROOT:/cvs/debian-policy Module name:debian-policy Changes by: srivastaSat Apr 28 12:10:09 PDT 2001 Modified files: . : policy.sgml Log message: TeX got confused by the new perl regexpo in policy; had to create a woraround to package policy

Bug#66023: PROPOSAL] Re: Shared libs vs. plugins.

2001-04-28 Thread Richard Braakman
On Sat, Apr 28, 2001 at 12:37:22PM -0500, Manoj Srivastava wrote: > +to by third party executables (binaries of other packages), > +should be installed in the subdirectories of the ^^^ I would drop that "the", to make clear that packages can create

CVS srivasta: * [ACCEPTED 2/4/01] /var/mail and /var/spool/mail closes: Bug#42052

2001-04-28 Thread debian-policy
CVSROOT:/cvs/debian-policy Module name:debian-policy Changes by: srivastaSat Apr 28 11:36:54 PDT 2001 Modified files: . : policy.sgml upgrading-checklist.html debian : changelog rules Added files: . : perl-policy.s

Bug#66023: PROPOSAL] Re: Shared libs vs. plugins.

2001-04-28 Thread Josip Rodin
On Sat, Apr 28, 2001 at 12:37:22PM -0500, Manoj Srivastava wrote: > I second this proposal, subject to the typographical and > grammatical corrections included below. Thanks. :) > --- policy.sgml.prevMon Jul 10 11:01:16 2000 > > +++ policy.sgml Mon J

Bug#66023: [PROPOSAL] Re: Shared libs vs. plugins.

2001-04-28 Thread Manoj Srivastava
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hi, I second this proposal, subject to the typographical and grammatical corrections included below. manoj --- policy.sgml.prevMon Jul 10 11:01:16 2000 +++ policy.sgml Mon Jul 10 11:41:12 2000

Re: Old proposals again (Re: [PROPOSAL] Re: Shared libs vs. plugins.)

2001-04-28 Thread Manoj Srivastava
>>"Anthony" == Anthony Towns writes: Anthony> Pester people on IRC to second ones that you think are good ideas but Anthony> haven't received any attention. This should be anyone on this list who is interesterd in the policy proposals (if you are not interested in policy, why are you

Re: [PROPOSAL] Re: Shared libs vs. plugins.

2001-04-28 Thread Manoj Srivastava
>>"Josip" == Josip Rodin <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: Josip> Our inability to get this into Policy is appaling, isn't it? :< You are being too hard on yourself. Putting together a proposal that gathers seconds is non trivial; one has to convince people of the rationale, come up with the

Bug#66023: [shaleh@valinux.com: Re: [PROPOSAL] Re: Shared libs vs. plugins.]

2001-04-28 Thread Josip Rodin
Just so it's noted. - Forwarded message from Sean 'Shaleh' Perry <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> - Delivery-date: Fri, 27 Apr 2001 18:58:28 +0200 X-Priority: 3 (Normal) Date: Fri, 27 Apr 2001 09:59:47 -0700 (PDT) Organization: VA Linux From: "Sean 'Shaleh' Perry" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> To: Josip Rodin