On Sun, Mar 11, 2001 at 10:02:28PM -0500, Peter S Galbraith wrote:
> > > I'm packaging viewmol, a program for visualising molecules, used in
> > > computational chemistry.
> > >
> > > The question arises, what subsection should it be put into?
> > > A comparable program, rasmol, is already in debi
Previously Sean 'Shaleh' Perry wrote:
> Debian developers should be able to read and if need be NMU another
> developers package. Allowing rules files to be arbitrary code makes
> this harder.
So are you going to propose to prohibit people to use dbs, yada, debstd,
debhelper or other strange sche
Previously Martin Quinson wrote:
> I've just checked the policy, and it does not say where the translated man
> pages should go. The FHS is clear on this point (see
> http://www.pathname.com/fhs/2.1/fhs-4.7.2.html), and as the policy says we
> should follow it, it's not a critical issue, but I thin
> "Oliver" == Oliver Elphick writes:
Oliver> "J.H.M. Dassen (Ray)" wrote:
>> On Sun, Mar 11, 2001 at 16:43:13 +, Oliver Elphick wrote:
Oliver> [that PostgreSQL appears to need to move to non-us, since it now
has SSL
Oliver> hooks in it]
>>> As far as I am aware, it wi
Martin Quinson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>I've just checked the policy, and it does not say where the translated man
>pages should go. The FHS is clear on this point (see
>http://www.pathname.com/fhs/2.1/fhs-4.7.2.html), and as the policy says we
>should follow it, it's not a critical issue, but I
Hello,
I've just checked the policy, and it does not say where the translated man
pages should go. The FHS is clear on this point (see
http://www.pathname.com/fhs/2.1/fhs-4.7.2.html), and as the policy says we
should follow it, it's not a critical issue, but I think it would be good to
update the
6 matches
Mail list logo
