Re: Proposal: Splitting cgi-bin

2001-01-20 Thread Brian White
> Brian> This this has now passed the first step of a policy change, > Brian> I'm changing the bug title and severity. Sorry for the > Brian> delay... I hadn't realized what I had to do. > > The one problem I see with this proposal is that it does not > put into place any transition

Re: Proposal: Splitting cgi-bin

2001-01-20 Thread Manoj Srivastava
>>"Brian" == Brian White <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: Brian> This this has now passed the first step of a policy change, Brian> I'm changing the bug title and severity. Sorry for the Brian> delay... I hadn't realized what I had to do. The one problem I see with this proposal is that

Re: undocumented.7 being abused

2001-01-20 Thread Chris Waters
On Sat, Jan 20, 2001 at 07:37:10PM +0100, Marcelo E. Magallon wrote: > All the manpages are symlinks to undocumented.7. Looking at the bug > reports for gnome-panel, this hasn't been reported as a bug, so this is > a violation of policy. Of course, reporting this as a violation of > policy i

Processed: change severity

2001-01-20 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]: > severity 32263 normal Bug#32263: [AMENDMENT 20/01/2000] Splitting cgi-bin Severity set to `normal'. > -- Stopping processing here. Please contact me if you need assistance. Darren Benham (administrator, Debian Bugs database)

Re: undocumented.7 being abused

2001-01-20 Thread Nicolás Lichtmaier
> Since lintian reports the absence of a manpage as an error, maintainers > (specially new maintainer) proceed to install a link pointing to > undocumented.7 instead of actually providing a manpage. Before > proposing to get rid of this, I'd like to hear opinions as to why we > should allow t

undocumented.7 being abused

2001-01-20 Thread Marcelo E. Magallon
Hi, while trying to reproduce a bug against Window Maker, I had to install gnome-panel. If one looks at the packages contents, one gets: /. /usr /usr/share /usr/share/doc /usr/share/doc/gnome-panel /usr/share/doc/gnome-panel/copyright /usr/share/doc/gnome-panel/changelog.gz /usr/share/

Processed: Re: Proposal: Splitting cgi-bin

2001-01-20 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]: > retitle 32263 [AMENDMENT 20/01/2000] Splitting cgi-bin Bug#32263: [PROPOSAL] Splitting cgi-bin Changed Bug title. > severity normal Unknown command or malformed arguments to command. > -- Stopping processing here. Please contact me if you need assist

Re: Proposal: Splitting cgi-bin

2001-01-20 Thread Brian White
retitle 32263 [AMENDMENT 20/01/2000] Splitting cgi-bin severity normal -- This this has now passed the first step of a policy change, I'm changing the bug title and severity. Sorry for the delay... I hadn't realized what I had to do. > - > Most people setting up a web site expect /cgi-bin/

Bug#82966: X font utilities moved from xbase-clients to xutils

2001-01-20 Thread Roland Rosenfeld
Package: debian-policy Version: 3.2.1.2 Severity: normal In XFree86 4 several X11 font utilities (bdftopcf, mkfontdir, update-fonts-scale, and update-fonts-alias) are moved from xbase-clients package to xutils package. I didn't find a hint, on which version bdftopcf and mkfontdir where moved exac