On Tue, Nov 28, 2000 at 03:48:46PM -0900, Britton wrote:
> > In other words, we have no way to control what "baddies" do with
> > Debian. The best we can do is make it easy and convenient for
> > "goodies" to do the right thing (whatever that may be). The entire
> > discussion about trying to pr
> In other words, we have no way to control what "baddies" do with
> Debian. The best we can do is make it easy and convenient for
> "goodies" to do the right thing (whatever that may be). The entire
> discussion about trying to prevent "bug report hoarding" is futile and
> moot -- we have no co
On Mon, Nov 27, 2000 at 10:35:58PM -0800, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
> Would it be technically feasable for a VAD (value-added distributor) to
> be able to tee a bug report, that is have it go to them, AND go to Debian
> with a flag stating that the VAD also has the bug?
It is technically feasible
On Sun, Nov 26, 2000 at 08:17:01PM -0500, Ben Collins wrote:
> Heh, without saying too much, commercial entities working with GPL
> software does not mean that they will turn in bug reports and fixes
> upstream, nor does it mean they mind working with custom patches. This is
A lot of what you're
On Mon, 27 Nov 2000, Britton wrote:
>
> > > > Origin: Debian
> > > > Bugs-To: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> > > >
> > > > Which is clearly entirely reasonable and legitimate.
> > >
> > > No, it's not. If you want to make a package special instead of making it
> > > an integral part of Debian cha
5 matches
Mail list logo
