* Anthony Towns [001009 21:10]:
> Well, which of emacs or vi should be the "preferred" editor?
This is missing the biggest question of all -- which of the various Vi
clones should be THE vi Debian suggests?
Vim, of course.
:)
debian-boot: This is diverging into a discussion of task- packages. It's
probably reasonable to keep discussion on -policy rather than duplicate it
on both lists, I guess.
On Mon, Oct 09, 2000 at 03:56:15PM -0500, Steve Greenland wrote:
> As far as "mutliple preferred packages", my intent is that
Madame, Monsieur,
Activité multimédia du groupe Lagardère,
digitall.fr vous fait profiter de l'expérience d'un des premiers groupes mondiaux du multimédia. Le catalogue
digitall.fr vous offre la plus large vision des loisirs numériques et des nouveautés dans tous les secteurs
> "Josip" == Josip Rodin <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
Josip> On Mon, Oct 09, 2000 at 12:25:20PM -0500, Steve Greenland
Josip> wrote:
>> > should also contain these virtual packages from the
>> Miscellaneous section: > > pdf-preview Any preprocessor that
>> creates PDF output
On 09-Oct-00, 13:57 (CDT), Anthony Towns wrote:
> On Mon, Oct 09, 2000 at 12:13:47PM -0500, Steve Greenland wrote:
> >
> > preferred: The Debian preferred implementation of a common service that
> > has multiple implementations (e.g. webservers, SMTP, mp3 players, etc.)
>
> Couldn't that just g
And some of the task- packages should logically conflict with each other,
because they depend or reccomend conflicting packages.
For example, if task-gnome-desktop depended on gdm (which it doesn't
according to my apt-cache), then it and task-kde should be made to
conflict because gdm and kdm con
On Tue, Oct 10, 2000 at 05:18:05AM +1000, Anthony Towns wrote:
> 'common': everything that might reasonably appear in an "ff the
> shelf" install (ie, the contents of all task- packages)
I think that not all task- packages would be "common". There are bound
to be some speciali
> > On 04-Oct-00, 14:27 (CDT), Anthony Towns wrote:
> > > So I wonder if changing it to something more like:
> > > 'important': things that will be on *every* system, except *very*
> > > specialised ones
> > > 'standard': everything that might reasonably appear in an "off the
> > >
On Mon, Oct 09, 2000 at 12:13:47PM -0500, Steve Greenland wrote:
> On 04-Oct-00, 14:27 (CDT), Anthony Towns wrote:
> > So I wonder if changing it to something more like:
> > 'important': things that will be on *every* system, except *very*
> > specialised ones
> > 'standard':
On Mon, Oct 09, 2000 at 12:25:20PM -0500, Steve Greenland wrote:
> > should also contain these virtual packages from the Miscellaneous section:
> >
> > pdf-preview Any preprocessor that creates PDF output
> > pdf-viewer Anything that can display PDF files
> > postscript-pr
On 02-Oct-00, 07:14 (CDT), Josip Rodin <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> should also contain these virtual packages from the Miscellaneous section:
>
> pdf-preview Any preprocessor that creates PDF output
> pdf-viewer Anything that can display PDF files
> postscript-preview
On 04-Oct-00, 14:27 (CDT), Anthony Towns wrote:
> So I wonder if changing it to something more like:
>
> 'important': things that will be on *every* system, except *very*
> specialised ones
> 'standard': everything that might reasonably appear in an "off the
>
12 matches
Mail list logo
