Here is my revised text for this proposal. I guess it wouldn't hurt to get a
few seconds for it.
2.3.2. The maintainer of a package
--
- Every package must have exactly one maintainer at a time. This person
- is responsible that the license of the packa
Franklin Belew wrote:
> >>> Joey> with the policy of the distribution this package is included
> >>> in.
> The dangling preposition in the last sentence.
> "the distribution this package is included in" should read
> "the distribution in which this package is included."
Oh, I thought you
On Tue, Dec 07, 1999 at 11:53:05AM -0600, Zed Pobre wrote:
> Well, it's a really obscure nit in the US now that the American
> language has become so, uh, relaxed, but...
And in every other major English speaking country too...
> I believe the official rule is "may not end a sentence with a
Manoj Srivastava wrote:
> I beg pardon. As I understand it, to run something by someone
> implies getting consent. Is that now what you meant? If run something
> by means mention in passing, well and good. Anything beyond that is
> undue external influence ;-)
Ok, perhaps it wasn't clea
[EMAIL PROTECTED] (Thomas Bushnell, BSG) writes:
>
> Franklin Belew <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
>
> > The dangling preposition in the last sentence.
> > "the distribution this package is included in" should read
> > "the distribution in which this package is included."
>
> Of course, Shakespea
Franklin Belew <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> The dangling preposition in the last sentence.
> "the distribution this package is included in" should read
> "the distribution in which this package is included."
Of course, Shakespeare happily ended sentences with prepositions, no
matter what your g
Hi,
>>"Joey" == Joey Hess <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
Joey> I said "run by Bruce". I didn't say we had to go petition the
Joey> great white god.
I beg pardon. As I understand it, to run something by someone
implies getting consent. Is that now what you meant? If run something
by means
On Mon, Dec 06, 1999 at 03:21:58PM -0800, Joey Hess wrote:
> Franklin Belew wrote:
>> On Sat, Dec 04, 1999 at 01:31:55AM -0600, Manoj Srivastava wrote:
>>> Hi,
>"Joey" == Joey Hess <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
>>>
>>> Urk. I find this confusing (perhaps I have far too set an idea
>>> a
8 matches
Mail list logo
