On Sun, Nov 14, 1999 at 09:13:48PM -0300, Nicolás Lichtmaier wrote:
> > I thought about naming it 'crypto', but it would also not describe it
> > correctly
> > (since we also have packages encumbered by other silly laws there, like
> > software patents). Any ideas?
Do we really have other package
On Nov 15, Philip Hands wrote:
> I actually think this is the wrong way round. We should really
> arrange things so that the complete system is available on a server
> somewhere, and then servers in countries that have onerous
> restrictions should just avoid mirroring the bits they are not allowe
Nicolás Lichtmaier <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> > I thought about naming it 'crypto', but it would also not describe it
> > correctly
> > (since we also have packages encumbered by other silly laws there, like
> > software patents). Any ideas?
>
> legally-unsafe ?
> country-sensitive ?
> re
> I thought about naming it 'crypto', but it would also not describe it
> correctly
> (since we also have packages encumbered by other silly laws there, like
> software patents). Any ideas?
legally-unsafe ?
country-sensitive ?
rebel ?
Wow, the `rebel' one is nice.
We would say: "Let's uplo
4 matches
Mail list logo
