Brian May wrote:
> As an alternative, I would suggest moving any files from /usr/doc to
> /usr/share/doc. Of course, this would have to be done after any dpkg
> managed files under /usr/doc have already been deleted, especially if
> upgrading.
That seems quite difficult to do. Suppose you have pac
Ulf Jaenicke-Roessler wrote:
> Package: debhelper
> Version: N/A
> Severity: wishlist
> For example, I found that libpanel-applet0 leaves a single file
> in its old doc directory (currently unexplainable and unreproducable
> by the maintainer) preventing the compatibility link to be created.
"J.H.M. Dassen \(Ray\)" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> On Sun, Oct 03, 1999 at 18:28:14 +0200, Marcus Brinkmann wrote:
> > Can we please have this document in a package (the mime package or policy
> > package or whereever)?
> I'm merely following menu's lead here. debian-policy includes the
> menu
Ulf Jaenicke-Roessler <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> I'd like to mention some general problems with packages migrating
> from /usr/doc to /usr/share/doc. Some of these problems exist,
> although they are very hard to explain and/or to reproduce.
>
> For example, I found that libpanel-applet0 le
> The question is, should the migration, for packages which want to
> do it at all, be enforced? I.e., should the old doc directory be
> deleted (rm -rf) before dh_installdocs tries to create the link?
> 'ln -snf' (no dereference) might help for wrong links.
I am confused. Are you talking about bu
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
> close 46516
Bug#46516: [PROPOSAL] MIME support sub-policy
Bug closed, ack sent to submitter - they'd better know why !
> reopen 46516
Bug#46516: [PROPOSAL] MIME support sub-policy
Bug reopened, originator not changed.
> retitle 46516 [AMENDMENT 04/10/
close 46516
reopen 46516
retitle 46516 [AMENDMENT 04/10/1999] MIME support sub-policy
severity 46516 normal
thanks
The proposal was seconded by Wichert Akkerman, Alexander Koch, Raul Miller
and Chris Waters; no serious objections have been raised so far.
Ray
--
Obsig: developing a new sig
On Sun, Oct 03, 1999 at 18:28:14 +0200, Marcus Brinkmann wrote:
> Can we please have this document in a package (the mime package or policy
> package or whereever)?
I'm merely following menu's lead here. debian-policy includes the
menu-policy document, but refers to the FTP site as its canonical l
On Sun, Oct 03, 1999 at 11:24:21 -0400, Raul Miller wrote:
> [As far as I can tell, you're documenting existing practice.]
Indeed. The goal is to promote the existing practice into policy so it'll be
implemented by more packages.
Ray
--
Obsig: developing a new sig
Package: debhelper
Version: N/A
Severity: wishlist
(I'm not sure, if this is the right form to handle this, but I
didn't know better. Sorry, if this might not be okay)
Hi,
I'd like to mention some general problems with packages migrating
from /usr/doc to /usr/share/doc. Some of these proble
Seconded.
Regards,
Alexander
--
Alexander Koch - <>< - WWJD - aka Efraim - PGP 0xE7694969 - ARGH-RIPE
Raul Miller wrote:
> On Sat, Oct 02, 1999 at 06:05:53PM +1000, Herbert Xu wrote:
> > Here's a quote from the policy:
> >
> > `Non-free' contains packages which are not compliant with the DFSG or
> > which are encumbered by patents or other legal issues that make their
> > distributi
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
In Bug#46516, "J.H.M. Dassen \(Ray\)" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> I'd like to see MIME support become as successful as menu support, and
> therefore I'm proposing the addition of a MIME support sub-policy.
Seconded.
- --
Chris Waters [EMAIL PROTECTED] | I
Previously J.H.M. Dassen Ray" wrote:
> Goal of this proposal
> =
>
> I'd like to see MIME support become as successful as menu support, and
> therefore I'm proposing the addition of a MIME support sub-policy.
Seconded.
Wichert.
--
===
14 matches
Mail list logo
