Bug#39830: PROPOSED]: get rid of undocumented(7) symlinks

1999-06-25 Thread Chris Waters
Jim Lynch <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > If it is decided to keep undocumented(7), howbout we make dpkg -L > report on symlinks to it? Riiight. We'll just file a bug against dpkg. That'll get some action! :-) Anyway, that doesn't address the issue of people who seem to think their job is done

Re: weekly policy summary

1999-06-25 Thread Darren O. Benham
On Fri, Jun 25, 1999 at 12:49:23PM -0700, Joey Hess wrote: > Let's Debian blow... gracefully! > * Old. > * Proposed by Fabien Ninoles; seconded by Sean E. Perry, Edward > Betts and Peter Makholm. > * Creation of a sub-directory aside from main, contrib, non-free > named data, that wil

weekly policy summary

1999-06-25 Thread Joey Hess
Here's what's been happening on debian-policy this week. (47 emails) It's been a very quiet week. Note: for details of the policy process, see http://www.debian.org/~srivasta/policy/ch3.html. Also, this summary is available on the web at http://kitenet.net/~joey/policy-weekly.html (and that page

Re: Bug#39830: [PROPOSED]: get rid of undocumented(7) symlinks

1999-06-25 Thread Jim Lynch
Hi Roland, *: If it is decided to keep undocumented(7), howbout we make dpkg -L report on symlinks to it? -Jim

Bug#40180: packaging manual typo

1999-06-25 Thread Mark W. Eichin
Package: packaging-manual Version: 2.5.1.0 --- /tmp/packaging.sgml 1999/06/25 13:43:29 1.1 +++ /tmp/packaging.sgml 1999/06/25 13:43:38 @@ -3687,7 +3687,7 @@ This is used to declare that one package may be more useful with one or more others. Using this field

ITP: java-common and friends (Warning: policy problem)

1999-06-25 Thread Stephane Bortzmeyer
[Copy to debian-policy, I don't read it but I prefer they know what's going on.] I'm currently working on a Java architecture for Debian. We have, for a very long time, thanks to people like Stephen Zander, Java implementations for Debian (unfortunately most of

Re: Bug#39830: debian-policy: [PROPOSED]: get rid of undocumented(7) symlinks

1999-06-25 Thread Chris Waters
Jim Lynch <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > Essentially, the reason is to keep bug reports down. Some folx report bugs en > masse and undocumented(7) was/is seen as a way to keep the bug reports down. Yes, but it's not working, as demonstrated by a) all the packages that use undocumented(7), but *don

Re: Bug#39830: debian-policy: [PROPOSED]: get rid of undocumented(7) symlinks

1999-06-25 Thread Jim Lynch
Bug blessed by policy... Essentially, the reason is to keep bug reports down. Some folx report bugs en masse and undocumented(7) was/is seen as a way to keep the bug reports down. If "man foo" could say "There is no man page, see for equivalent/ better information, the maintainer is aware of the